Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
Maybe, maybe not.
Its not the same exact glass.
Stephen
Tom Abrahamsson said earlier in this thread that it was the same optical formula. Is that wrong?
Maybe, maybe not.
Its not the same exact glass.
Stephen
Anyone have a link from Cosina Voigtlander for the press release? I want to know how the two are different!
Why anyone would think the focusing ring design is stupid is beyond me. I have trouble focusing the old version because the focusing ring is too smooth, the ridges aren't deep enough. The focusing ring in the new version seems vastly improved, very tactile, and easy to find by touch.
Hmmm ... it does look a bit strange! Seems kind of narrow and knobby.
I hadn't thought of that before - all the lenses I've tried with this sort of focus ring have been for SLRs, where such a ring just makes it hard to find in a hurry. As a form of super-focus-tab on a body with no mirror box it makes a lot of sense.so, i've never used a lens with that style focus ring so close to the base of the lens. is the idea that you should be able to use the fingers on your right hand to focus?
Anyone have a link from Cosina Voigtlander for the press release? I want to know how the two are different!
so, i've never used a lens with that style focus ring so close to the base of the lens. is the idea that you should be able to use the fingers on your right hand to focus?
I think this is a copy of the Prominent design from the 1950's (http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Prominent_(35mm) ) The 50 1.5 was a gem of the time and very few made it onto M/LTM bodies. I think the current Nokton is a different design.