gertf
Established
LeicaTom: I paid $350 for mine (LTM mount) in supposedly EX+ condition from Adorama. Great lens, but still needed a CLA due to focus ring looseness/stiffness and aperture ring behaving a bit strangely.
Looking at these photos I can't wait to get mine back from Sherry Krauter who's currently looking after it.
Looking at these photos I can't wait to get mine back from Sherry Krauter who's currently looking after it.
Mael
Established
Roel said:
Hi Roel.
I'm really pleased the lens I sold you is in such good hands ! I'm missing it a little, but your portraits are so nice, I like the crying girl very much.
Best.
M.
dave lackey
Veteran
Roel,
Very nice...what film were you using?
Very nice...what film were you using?
Sonnar2
Well-known
The 105/2.5 in LTM is a very nice lens but heavy as a stone and can be difficult to focus as accurate as Roel accomplished in his pic's.
It's much easier to work with the F-mount version. You get a Nikon FTN Photomic plus for the price of the LTM lens.
BTW, the later version of the lens (1972+) isn't bad either.
It's much easier to work with the F-mount version. You get a Nikon FTN Photomic plus for the price of the LTM lens.
BTW, the later version of the lens (1972+) isn't bad either.