vicmortelmans
Well-known
I've abandoned lab printing from film because it's quite expensive and troublesome to order only a subset of pictures from a film. My workflow is now to scan from film and order digitally. For b&w, my major problem is still getting control over print quality, while for color, I'm mostly struggling to get decent scans.
Up till now, I only used color negative film. My (not too expensive) filmscanner seems to have a hard time getting decent results.
Is it a good idea to try slide film for a change? Will it be easier for the filmscanner to handle? I see one pro: postprocessing is not that critical, because the color is in the raw scan, but I also see one contra: slides have a higher density range (right?), so this may go beyond the limits of my scanner.
What is the experience in comparing negative film to slide film for scanning?
I've bought three rolls Fuji Sensia: 100, 200 and 400, so I can try it out... (quite expensive, slide film, but development is cheap).
I also discovered that I can get slide film developed and returned as a roll, that's good, because my scanner can take a complete roll and scan unattended.
Groeten,
Vic
Up till now, I only used color negative film. My (not too expensive) filmscanner seems to have a hard time getting decent results.
Is it a good idea to try slide film for a change? Will it be easier for the filmscanner to handle? I see one pro: postprocessing is not that critical, because the color is in the raw scan, but I also see one contra: slides have a higher density range (right?), so this may go beyond the limits of my scanner.
What is the experience in comparing negative film to slide film for scanning?
I've bought three rolls Fuji Sensia: 100, 200 and 400, so I can try it out... (quite expensive, slide film, but development is cheap).
I also discovered that I can get slide film developed and returned as a roll, that's good, because my scanner can take a complete roll and scan unattended.
Groeten,
Vic
Last edited: