

Show us a photo of the negs. A mobile phone photo against a white computer screen is fine.I have developed 2 rolls of Fomapan 100 - 120. In almost all of the photos I have a greenish colour generally in the bottom of the photo. I developed in Ilford Ilfosol 3. Any thoughts?
My first thought is that you didn't prewash enough.I have developed 2 rolls of Fomapan 100 - 120. In almost all of the photos I have a greenish colour generally in the bottom of the photo. I developed in Ilford Ilfosol 3. Any thoughts?
Do a tempering/pre-wash for a minute with plain water before you develop. Your water will come out green. It is the anti-halation layer washing off.I have developed 2 rolls of Fomapan 100 - 120. In almost all of the photos I have a greenish colour generally in the bottom of the photo. I developed in Ilford Ilfosol 3. Any thoughts?

These are great photos.Last time I noticed QC issues was around 2015. Horrible scratches on the emulsion. Since then I shot 4 foma (2×100 and 2×200) and no issues with them. I also have 2×400 in 35mm.
These are both shot with foma100, developer is HC110. Both shot with a Rolleicord Ia with an uncoated Triotar 75f/4.5
View attachment 4824083
View attachment 4824084
beautiful, making me want to try this combo.I think that's more down to developer than the film. I'm not familiar with L110 but based on name, dilution and image, I'm guessing it's an HC-110 clone, and as I mentioned earlier on this thread, HC-110 variants and derivatives tend to lead to blown highlights.
Rodinal is a far better developer for this film - much better dynamic range and tonal curve. Here's a recent one with a very contrasty scene:
View attachment 4825129
(Leica Ic, Voigtlander 28mm Color Skopar, Fomapan 100 in Rodinal 1:50)
That would have been an absolute mess if I'd used HC-110 or LC29. As it is, nothing is completely blown out, midtones are where I like them, and there's a good amount of shadow detail. This is straight from the scanner, too - no levels adjustments at all.
Dad by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Coronet in the Woods by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on FlickrThe first one is great, and the last one is the best photo I’ve seen in a long time.I think Fomapan 100 is a great film. Absolutely stellar. The fact that it can be had so cheaply (relatively) is an added bonus. I bought 100' earlier this year; thankfully, no emulsion flaws (like the last 100' roll of Fomapan 400 I purchased). It works very well in Xtol.
Dad by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Nikon F6, Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1
Coronet in the Woods by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M7, Artizlab 35mm f/1.4, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M5, Light Lens Lab 35mm f/2 '8-Element,' Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.
beautiful images.I think Fomapan 100 is a great film. Absolutely stellar. The fact that it can be had so cheaply (relatively) is an added bonus. I bought 100' earlier this year; thankfully, no emulsion flaws (like the last 100' roll of Fomapan 400 I purchased). It works very well in Xtol.
Dad by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Nikon F6, Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1
Coronet in the Woods by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M7, Artizlab 35mm f/1.4, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.
Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M5, Light Lens Lab 35mm f/2 '8-Element,' Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.
Love the luminous sheep.View attachment 4881889
Isle of Skye, Canon 35/2 LTM
View attachment 4881890
Greyfriars Bobby, Edinburgh