FOMAPAN 100, image samples

I used some outdated Fomapan 100 120 size in my 1950's British 'Ensign Selfix 16/20 Model I + 75mm f4.5 ENSAR lens on a walkabout in Admiral's Park, CHELMSFORD Essex England and processed in my Home-Made 2-bath developer. There was some fog level in the rebates but I managed to get some darkroom Prints out on some old Ilfobrom Glossy Grade 2 S/W 7x5" with my Durst M601 enlarger and scanned them
2023-10-12-0001.jpg2023-10-12-0002.jpg
 
I have developed 2 rolls of Fomapan 100 - 120. In almost all of the photos I have a greenish colour generally in the bottom of the photo. I developed in Ilford Ilfosol 3. Any thoughts?
 
I have developed 2 rolls of Fomapan 100 - 120. In almost all of the photos I have a greenish colour generally in the bottom of the photo. I developed in Ilford Ilfosol 3. Any thoughts?
Show us a photo of the negs. A mobile phone photo against a white computer screen is fine.
 
I have developed 2 rolls of Fomapan 100 - 120. In almost all of the photos I have a greenish colour generally in the bottom of the photo. I developed in Ilford Ilfosol 3. Any thoughts?
My first thought is that you didn't prewash enough.

The prewash on 120 rolls of Fomapan comes out a strong jade green colour. It sounds like some of that was left in.
 
LT231107.jpg


Leica IIIg, Summicron, fresh Fomapan 100 Classic loaded from a bulk roll.
HC-110, E, 8min, 20C, 1 inversion every 30 seconds.
 
I have developed 2 rolls of Fomapan 100 - 120. In almost all of the photos I have a greenish colour generally in the bottom of the photo. I developed in Ilford Ilfosol 3. Any thoughts?
Do a tempering/pre-wash for a minute with plain water before you develop. Your water will come out green. It is the anti-halation layer washing off.
 
I agree with the others here. Fomapan's anti-halation layer is a similar colour to Martian snot. I develop infrequently enough to have always forgotten just how GREEN!!! it is by the next time.

 
I'm ressurecting this old thread because I've been shooting some fresh Foma 100 recently and it got significantly better. No stupid color mask, no spots, dries flat. I got mine from bulk roll vendor and they source it fresh from the factory. I know many folks got burnt with Fomapan but if you are cheap like me give it a go, maybe this time you'll like it.

wop921.jpg
Old Muthill Church, Canon 35/2 LTM
 
Last time I noticed QC issues was around 2015. Horrible scratches on the emulsion. Since then I shot 4 foma (2×100 and 2×200) and no issues with them. I also have 2×400 in 35mm.

These are both shot with foma100, developer is HC110. Both shot with a Rolleicord Ia with an uncoated Triotar 75f/4.5

View attachment 4824083

View attachment 4824084
These are great photos.
 
I think that's more down to developer than the film. I'm not familiar with L110 but based on name, dilution and image, I'm guessing it's an HC-110 clone, and as I mentioned earlier on this thread, HC-110 variants and derivatives tend to lead to blown highlights.

Rodinal is a far better developer for this film - much better dynamic range and tonal curve. Here's a recent one with a very contrasty scene:

View attachment 4825129
(Leica Ic, Voigtlander 28mm Color Skopar, Fomapan 100 in Rodinal 1:50)

That would have been an absolute mess if I'd used HC-110 or LC29. As it is, nothing is completely blown out, midtones are where I like them, and there's a good amount of shadow detail. This is straight from the scanner, too - no levels adjustments at all.
beautiful, making me want to try this combo.
 
For HC110 (at least the original variant) I would also recommend trying 100:1 stand developed for an hour. 4 inversions at the start and 4 inversions at 30 minutes. Works great with Fomapan 100 and many other films. I tend to develop all my B&W this way and don't hesitate to mix different films when developing.

53343498274_ca1bf83c4b_h.jpg


Kraken 612 with Schneider 47mm f5.6, Fomapan 100 HC-110 100:1 stand

53140186150_ff4052e40f_h.jpg


Bronica S2A Nikkor-D 40mm f4 Fomapan 100 HC-110 100:1
 
I think Fomapan 100 is a great film. Absolutely stellar. The fact that it can be had so cheaply (relatively) is an added bonus. I bought 100' earlier this year; thankfully, no emulsion flaws (like the last 100' roll of Fomapan 400 I purchased). It works very well in Xtol.

Dad by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Nikon F6, Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1

Coronet in the Woods by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M7, Artizlab 35mm f/1.4, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.

Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M5, Light Lens Lab 35mm f/2 '8-Element,' Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.
 
I think Fomapan 100 is a great film. Absolutely stellar. The fact that it can be had so cheaply (relatively) is an added bonus. I bought 100' earlier this year; thankfully, no emulsion flaws (like the last 100' roll of Fomapan 400 I purchased). It works very well in Xtol.

Dad by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Nikon F6, Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1

Coronet in the Woods by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M7, Artizlab 35mm f/1.4, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.

Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M5, Light Lens Lab 35mm f/2 '8-Element,' Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.
The first one is great, and the last one is the best photo I’ve seen in a long time.
 
I think Fomapan 100 is a great film. Absolutely stellar. The fact that it can be had so cheaply (relatively) is an added bonus. I bought 100' earlier this year; thankfully, no emulsion flaws (like the last 100' roll of Fomapan 400 I purchased). It works very well in Xtol.

Dad by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Nikon F6, Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1

Coronet in the Woods by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M7, Artizlab 35mm f/1.4, Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.

Jenny by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Leica M5, Light Lens Lab 35mm f/2 '8-Element,' Fomapan 100 @ 50, Xtol 1:1.
beautiful images.
 
Back
Top Bottom