Forum Civility over Beauty

anselwannab

Well-known
Local time
3:48 PM
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
457
Considering the spat of threads with bad blood and such this week, what if in the name of civility we made it so that your avatar had to be a picture of the poster? People have said that the anonimity on forums leads to some people being more boorish. If you had your mug next to what you wrote, would that change your tone?

An idea, maybe not a good one.

Mark
 
Naah, anonymity goes away after a couple of consistent posts with attitude. :)

Avatar ain't going to change that. But probably little common-sense "guide" will:

1. If you think you know more than most people, try not to show it.
2. If you *really* know more than most people, you *won't* show it anyways

:D

I miss Pitxu's avatars, though :)
 
anselwannab said:
Considering the spat of threads with bad blood and such this week, what if in the name of civility we made it so that your avatar had to be a picture of the poster? People have said that the anonimity on forums leads to some people being more boorish. If you had your mug next to what you wrote, would that change your tone?

An idea, maybe not a good one.

Mark

I think your suggestion has merit. And yes, this is really me.

And I only wish I had had a Barnack Leica when I was the age of your avatar subject.
 
wgerrard said:
I haven't even bothered with an avatar.

Besides, how could you know that we'd use real photos of ourselves?
Dear Bill,

Or indeed our real names. I've had people explain to me why they don't, but I remain at best half-convinced. It's one of those things that must require different mind-sets; some can't see why anyone would use their real name, and others can't see why people don't.

Certainly I feel more comfortable with real names, and I find it very strange that people put someone else's face beside their name. I also find it odd when people use pictures of themselves as children: it may have been amusing once, a few decades ago, when it was an original idea, but why do it now? Still lifes, animals, logos, I can begin to understand. But what the hell.

Cheers,

Hermoniges Phniggs.
 
Once while giving a speech, Abraham Lincoln was accused of being two faced by a heckler. He replied something to the effect "If I had 2 faces do you think I'd be wearing this one?"

*edit* apoligies-- that may be an anecdote more for the yanks than our international members.
 
Well I am in my avatar but perhaps a little too small in the frame - mind you, if I had got in any closer, it would have started to get ugly!

:D
 
chris000 said:
Well I am in my avatar but perhaps a little too small in the frame - mind you, if I had got in any closer, it would have started to get ugly!

:D
Not only that: the radiator is in the wrong place and someone appears to have stolen the bit that goes down the middle of the windscreen. I think your Series III has been in an accident and been bodged up...

Cheers,

R.
 
anselwannab said:
Considering the spat of threads with bad blood and such this week, what if in the name of civility we made it so that your avatar had to be a picture of the poster? People have said that the anonimity on forums leads to some people being more boorish. If you had your mug next to what you wrote, would that change your tone?

An idea, maybe not a good one.

Mark

Mine is. I was an ugly child.
 
crawdiddy said:
I think your suggestion has merit. And yes, this is really me.

And I only wish I had had a Barnack Leica when I was the age of your avatar subject.


Ha, that's not a Leica, its a Zorki 6! The only camera that I trust my 2 year to hold!

Thanks everyone for the funny and thoughtful comments!

Using real names didn't seem to help photo.net be more civil.
 
Roger Hicks said:
Not only that: the radiator is in the wrong place and someone appears to have stolen the bit that goes down the middle of the windscreen. I think your Series III has been in an accident and been bodged up...

Cheers,

R.

Yes I'm sorry that it is a modern Land Rover Roger, but at least it does get used for what it was designed for! Salisbury Plain and the Byways of Wiltshire are good LR country.

:)
 
chris000 said:
Yes I'm sorry that it is a modern Land Rover Roger, but at least it does get used for what it was designed for! Salisbury Plain and the Byways of Wiltshire are good LR country.

:)
Dear Chris,

That's what it's about...

I don't have much time for trying to get stuck on Land Rover 'playgrounds': I'd much rather try NOT to get stuck on interesting unsurfaced roads. Have you tried the Pyrenees?

It's a bit like cameras. You take pictures with cameras; you go exploring with Land Rovers. Not much point in having either, otherwise.

Maybe I should use a smilar pic for my avatar. Do you read Land Rover World? I've had a column there for the last few months.

Cheers,

R.
 
Roger Hicks said:
I don't have much time for trying to get stuck on Land Rover 'playgrounds': I'd much rather try NOT to get stuck on interesting unsurfaced roads. Have you tried the Pyrenees?

I work on Salisbury Plain (the day job) but I know what you mean! I'm not too sure what the Army would think of your description of it as a 'playground' - I believe that they might regard it as very much their 'playground' :D

I've not been to the Pyrenees but it sounds like a good idea.


Do you read Land Rover World? I've had a column there for the last few months.

Occasionally, and I have seen your column.
 
chris000 said:
I work on Salisbury Plain (the day job) but I know what you mean! I'm not too sure what the Army would think of your description of it as a 'playground' - I believe that they might regard it as very much their 'playground' :D

I've not been to the Pyrenees but it sounds like a good idea.
Dear Chris,

No, I didn't mean the Army. I meant the ones you see advertised in the LR comics. The ones that describe themselves as playgrounds.

If you do decide to go to the Pyrenees, send me a PM; I can make some recommendations.

Cheers,

r.
 
I agree it's unsafe, and it's a very bad idea if you are employed. If you are employed and post from the company network, then it is double-dog-dare-ya bad idea.

Do I post on internet forums from work. . . during work hours? Yes.

Can the boss use this against me? Yes. (according to the US Courts.)

Can a potential employer use a search engine to see how much time I might waste at work? Yes. (Come to think of it if I were an employer I'd be curious too...)

Remember folks that your postings follow you around for the rest of your life.

By the way just who the hell is Warren1960 ? ? ? :cool:
 
Back
Top Bottom