back alley
IMAGES
56 or 90
56 and 90
your thoughts...
56 and 90
your thoughts...
What do you plan to use the 90mm for? Have you been missing a 135mm equiv lens while out photographing? Are you using your 56mm? Let your photography dictate your needs...
back alley
IMAGES
'your thoughts'...
i have mine but wondering about the photo world and how others see it.
i have mine but wondering about the photo world and how others see it.
Those were my thoughts. Ok, just buy it and keep both. Is that what you're looking for? 
pechelman
resu deretsiger
"my thoughts"?
I have very little to no need for a 135mm apart for the very rare landscape. Not into headshots.
I'd rather carry an ~85/90mm equiv and crop to 135 if needed. I used the 56 in the same way when I owned it (landscapes and portraits), but at least it was a little more flexible in using around town, at family gatherings, or on the street. If I was forced to own one it would be the 56.
Really though, I'd rather not carry either lens because the shots I'd want the 85/90mm equiv for are generally so few and far between. I have to have a purpose or project in mind to bring a longer lens than ~50mm equiv.
I have very little to no need for a 135mm apart for the very rare landscape. Not into headshots.
I'd rather carry an ~85/90mm equiv and crop to 135 if needed. I used the 56 in the same way when I owned it (landscapes and portraits), but at least it was a little more flexible in using around town, at family gatherings, or on the street. If I was forced to own one it would be the 56.
Really though, I'd rather not carry either lens because the shots I'd want the 85/90mm equiv for are generally so few and far between. I have to have a purpose or project in mind to bring a longer lens than ~50mm equiv.
taemo
eat sleep shoot
for some reason I never got into 75mm, 85mm, 90mm focal length but I loved 135mm when I needed the reach from my 50mm.
it's all personal taste obviously but I like Don McCullin style, 28mm on main camera and 135mm on a 2nd when he cant get close or need the reach.
it's all personal taste obviously but I like Don McCullin style, 28mm on main camera and 135mm on a 2nd when he cant get close or need the reach.
back alley
IMAGES
Those were my thoughts. Ok, just buy it and keep both. Is that what you're looking for?
you seem short tempered with me lately...?
i am looking for conversation...and other people's ideas...tired of just my own thoughts...
back alley
IMAGES
somewhere along the line i had a 135 lens...in the film days and i can't remember what camera system i was using at the time. i also had a 200 which got used more and a 100 that i loved...might have been the olympus...i now have the 56 (85) and that's a pretty good lens...i'd like to use it more but i am going through a 'wide' phase and the 16 never leaves the xe2 body that it's on.
f16sunshine
Moderator
I'm going with the 55-200 until further need demands otherwise.
With Reflex i use 85 and 100mm often. The 135mm lenses seemed to languish when i acquired them.
The fuji 55-200 with it's beautiful rendering and extremely effective IS is a great lens.
I usually dislike zooms but this one is a keeper.
In images I've viewed, the 100mm looks super for portraits. I'm not as excited about the 56mm as I was before it's release.
Thought I would want one but after trying in store it just seemed like another 50mm cropped to aps-c.
i would not choose either for "street" work or to use stopped down.... preferring the flexibility of an IS zoom.
With Reflex i use 85 and 100mm often. The 135mm lenses seemed to languish when i acquired them.
The fuji 55-200 with it's beautiful rendering and extremely effective IS is a great lens.
I usually dislike zooms but this one is a keeper.
In images I've viewed, the 100mm looks super for portraits. I'm not as excited about the 56mm as I was before it's release.
Thought I would want one but after trying in store it just seemed like another 50mm cropped to aps-c.
i would not choose either for "street" work or to use stopped down.... preferring the flexibility of an IS zoom.
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
Hi Joe,
I thought of Saul Leiter when I saw your post. Many of his best images, in my opinion, were made with a telephoto lens (I think he liked a 150). He used the telephoto to compress street photo subject matter elements. I like the way this compression of elements can make a normal street scene come across more like a still-life painting.
I typically go about my street photo walks with either a 28mm or 50mm-equiv. lens on the X-Pro1 or X-T1. But Leiter's work inspires me to try something different. So recently I've been trying out the XF 60 on the streets. If I find I can't get the kind of compression I'm wanting, I might try an adapted Nikon Series E 100mm (150mm equiv.). This Nikon lens is very compact; the XF 90 looks too big to carry around on the streets all day.
I thought of Saul Leiter when I saw your post. Many of his best images, in my opinion, were made with a telephoto lens (I think he liked a 150). He used the telephoto to compress street photo subject matter elements. I like the way this compression of elements can make a normal street scene come across more like a still-life painting.
I typically go about my street photo walks with either a 28mm or 50mm-equiv. lens on the X-Pro1 or X-T1. But Leiter's work inspires me to try something different. So recently I've been trying out the XF 60 on the streets. If I find I can't get the kind of compression I'm wanting, I might try an adapted Nikon Series E 100mm (150mm equiv.). This Nikon lens is very compact; the XF 90 looks too big to carry around on the streets all day.
Not at all...I'm not sure why you think this. I asked a few questions thinking they were helpful and you didn't like that.
I'm a firm believer in picking focal lengths based on the photos I want to make. If I'm out photographing and I can't make a photo due to having the wrong lens, then I get the lens that allows me to make the photo the way I want. Somehow you took this as me not giving my thoughts (because it was in question form).
So then I just answered your "or / and" question... with "and."
back alley
IMAGES
thought i saw a change in writing style indicating a change in your mood...hard to judge on the net...
TheFlyingCamera
Well-known
When shooting a DSLR, I'm a fan of the 135 F2 for Canon EOS, so I'd be interested to try out the Fuji 90. Currently I have the 56 only. I'm really liking that lens so if I were forced to never have another telephoto lens, I could live happily enough with it.
Examples:
And...
Examples:
And...
emmef2
Established
56
90 is already too long for my view
90 is already too long for my view
narsuitus
Well-known
The 90mm is probably a very good lens. It is, however, too short for my needs and taste.
I have the 56mm but when I need something longer, I prefer the adapted 135mm f/2 Zeiss.
Darthfeeble
But you can call me Steve
If I had the question, I would always opt for the "and". In this particular instance I wouldn't care for either, but I do have a 12 and an 18. I would also do the 23 and the 35. I'm just a wide to normal kinda guy.