LCSmith
Well-known
And every other digital camera out there...if you are cynical enough to think digital is copying film all the time.
I am not sure what you mean; but it is true that I can be cynical.
And every other digital camera out there...if you are cynical enough to think digital is copying film all the time.
You could study the violin for 30 years..practice 15 hrs a day..and never have a chance of sounding like Heifetz..sound like Heifetz
I mean sure, I could use a synthesizer to replicate the sound of a violin and sound like Heifetz in a day or two after punching at some keys; but it's much more fun to learn to play a real violin.
You can also make photography harder by standing on one foot while shooting. And you don't even have to buy an expensive Leica camera. There is nothing hard about shooting a rangefinder. It is tying your shoes easy.This is well-said. I enjoy using real rangefinders (as in, a camera with a rangefinder focusing mechanism) precisely because they require so much from me. It's fun because it's difficult, but it's satisfying because it is more my own.
Are you seriously comparing learning to play a violin to manually focusing and manual exposure? I think you overestimate the skill involved in manually focusing and manual exposure. Everyone past a certain age had to do both of these to learn photography. It wasn't something that took a lot of time or effort... it was just something you did. Learning to play violin and even learning to play a synthesizer well takes a lot more time and effort.
You can also make photography harder by standing on one foot while shooting. And you don't even have to buy an expensive Leica camera. There is nothing hard about shooting a rangefinder. It is tying your shoes easy.
You could study the violin for 30 years..practice 15 hrs a day..and never have a chance of sounding like Heifetz..
Or get your synth..pump it up with Heifetz dna..
And still wont be there..lol
Half pressing a plastic tab?Oh I agree. But it is certainly more difficult than half pressing a plastic tab.
I hope I may be able to state an opinion without its being confused for doctrine.
If we must be precise, no camera is "almost" in its picture-making capabilities, so long as it makes pictures. Think of what Atget was able to do with his obsolete camera.
What is mediocre about the Fuji cameras? Again, NOT the images that can be made by them. Mediocre images are the products of mediocre photographers and have nothing to do with the camera's "image making capabilities" so I am speaking only of aesthetics and design.
The question here is also not one of "durability" since plastic is quite durable.
No, "candy cigarettes" I think gets to the point quite well, a kind of unabashed simulacrum.
"Instant mashed potatoes" works well too. Something which is consciously intended to simulate something else but doing so in a mediocre way while at the same time reducing the skill required by the user. That seems to me to be the rather express marketing strategy for those Fuji cameras.
So you have a long winded way of saying nothing but brand bashing.
Well done for adding nothing to the conversation.
Half pressing a plastic tab?
Oh indeed.
"Where should my focus be, camera?"
Damn... all that time I used manual focus, I hadn't realized I was a genius for knowing how to do it... what couldn't have been in my life if I kept at it. Now I use autofocus and my camera tells me where to focus. What a smart device... :bang:
Oh indeed.
"Where should my focus be, camera?"
It's interesting how both focus and camera are Latin words to do with interior spaces and domesticity.
Let me be clearer. What does "half pressing a plastic tab" mean?
I don't know why you consider your Fuji casual and your Leica all-in camera. Price?