Jake Mongey
Well-known
I recently shot a roll of this that expired in 1982 and I was just wondering if you have shot with this film you could share your results as my roll is drying now
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
Shot some (maybe a couple of rolls?) in the early-mid 70s. As I recall (take that with a grain of salt) tonality was different than Tri-x, but maybe a bit grainier. Can't remember what I used to process it - could have been D76, perhaps HC110.
I shot some of this shortly before it was discontinued about five or six years ago. Its an old school B&W film > wide latitude so very forgiving for exposure errors but quite grainy for ISO 100. Will be interesting to see what you can get out of a film that expired in 1982!
Here's a couple of shots taken with Neopan 100 SS. As you can see, quite grainy for ISO 100.

Odéon by Jon, on Flickr

Beating the heat by Jon, on Flickr
Here's a couple of shots taken with Neopan 100 SS. As you can see, quite grainy for ISO 100.

Odéon by Jon, on Flickr

Beating the heat by Jon, on Flickr
x-ray
Veteran
I shot a dozen rolls about 10 years ago but didn't care for it vs what I had been using. I think at the time I was using Delta 100 and 400. I bought it thinking it might be similar to FP4 but it wasn't. Like above I found it to be grainy with HC110 B. I do think with some experimentation it would have been a good film. If you have some take a few rolls and expose at normal ISO and then try several developers to see what worked best. I seem to remember development time in HC110 B was shorter thAn FP4. Being an old world emulsion one of the pyro developers might produce excellent long scale fine grain negs. If I had a supply that might be where I go first.
Jake Mongey
Well-known
I developed mine in Microphen at 1+1 and i can see the grain on the negatives, ill take it to get scanned over the next few days
Highway 61
Revisited
I shot a couple of rolls of that stuff in 2009. Extremely grainy for a 100 B&W film, high contrast, not very interesting at the end of the day.
wlaidley
Newbie
I bought 50 rolls shortly before it was discontinued and have about 30 left. I have developed it in either D-76 or Diafine. I don't have a scans as I wet print, but I do like the results I get. I just wish Fujifilm had not discontinued it, or that I had bought a *lot* more of it when I had the chance.
Jake Mongey
Well-known
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
IIRC Neopan SS was discontinued a few years before Neopan 400/Presto.
It's an "old school" emulsion; a little grainy but IMO not objectionably so.
Exposed and developed normally it's more contrasty than Ilford FP4+.
Chris
It's an "old school" emulsion; a little grainy but IMO not objectionably so.
Exposed and developed normally it's more contrasty than Ilford FP4+.
Chris
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.