The shutter is a question... I haven't seen any mention of the shutter by Fuji except to say it has little/no lag time. The shutter speed dial goes to 1/4000, which I think would eliminate a leaf shutter. But why put a focal plane shutter in a fixed-lens camera? Maybe this custom sensor can indeed capture without a mechanical shutter...
In a related issue, Fuji says there's a 3-stop ND filter... Is this a glass filter that is moved into the light path, or another trick of the sensor?
In a related issue, Fuji says there's a 3-stop ND filter... Is this a glass filter that is moved into the light path, or another trick of the sensor?
alexnotalex
Well-known
I wonder what we'd all get into if fuji sold a gazillion of these and everybody had one?
PKR
Veteran
without a mechnical shutter to "cut-off" light, grabbing snap-in-time data from a sensor will be blurry, due to the fact that the pixels are still gathering light.
Okay, I understand. How is the no-shutter frame grabbed in a 1.7 sensor?
Frame grabbing was done long ago with a delay line and a good sized buffer. I don't know what would be required with the current size memory dump done with a capture. it's a little out of my league, though I do understand the technology.
alexnotalex
Well-known
and what about good old digital zoom to turn the 35ish into a 50ish? I could live with 9MP...
user237428934
User deletion pending
and what about good old digital zoom to turn the 35ish into a 50ish? I could live with 9MP...
When my calculation is right then you crop 70% away on either side of the frame when you go from 35mm to 50mm. That's in total approx. 50% of the megapixels. That's 6 and not 9MP. Or am I wrong with my calculation?
Last edited:
MartinP
Veteran
Measuring my carry-around Zorki-1 (which is about the same size as a Barnack Leica II) with the 35mm CV pancake lens on it . . . comes to pretty much the same size as this Fuji. Very very pocketable - actually even smaller as I forgot about the accessory v/f on top of the Zorki.. A hell of a lot of people use 35mm equivalent for the majority of their pictures, so it's an excellent minimalistic idea in my opinion.
If only the X1 had had a pop-up viewfinder instead of a pop-up flash . . . .
If only the X1 had had a pop-up viewfinder instead of a pop-up flash . . . .
febreeze-showered
Member
Man, that thing's sexy. If I had to pick, I probably would go with the 35.
umcelinho
Marcelo
jackpot.
poor Leica.
If only the X1 had had a pop-up viewfinder instead of a pop-up flash . . . .
I don't get this line of reasoning... the external viewfinder for the X1 is bigger and brighter than anything Leica had in the Minilux and CM. It looks good with the Ext VF too... like a Leica Digital Standard. If they put in the camera it would change the camera's size and would be small and relatively useless.
alexnotalex
Well-known
When my calculation is right then you crop 70% away on either side of the frame when you go from 35mm to 50mm. That's in total approx. 50% of the megapixels. That's 6 and not 9MP. Or am I wrong with my calculation?
you're righter than me. I could probably live with 6.
jan normandale
Film is the other way
This is the digital version of the Yashica GSN
I'm getting both!
SimonSawSunlight
Simon Fabel
looks about right to me... finally a digital option. 
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I'm getting both!
If this Fuji camera is priced right , it will certainly be a hot seller Jan.
I wonder why it took these camera firms so long to get the idea?
jan normandale
Film is the other way
xayraa33, I'm joking! I'd get a Yashica but I think the Fuji will be about $2.000.00 +/-. I've got a couple of film cameras now and I don't really need more. I use the digital I have for sketches, so I don't need two.
It's an interesting market response from Fuji though, I'm glad they decided to provide a RF digital at a price point that will interest people. I'm sure this will lead to a product that will permit interchangeable lenses in due course.
It's an interesting market response from Fuji though, I'm glad they decided to provide a RF digital at a price point that will interest people. I'm sure this will lead to a product that will permit interchangeable lenses in due course.
Last edited:
Mister E
Well-known
I'm ready to buy, but where is the black version?
agfa100
Well-known
Check this video out on the X100 this is even more slick then it looks.....
http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-intros-finepix-x100-12-3mp-aps-c-based-camera-with-hyb/
It's about 1/4 down the page...
Enjoy, I know I did....
wbill
http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/19/fujifilm-intros-finepix-x100-12-3mp-aps-c-based-camera-with-hyb/
It's about 1/4 down the page...
Enjoy, I know I did....
wbill
Japan---Exposures
Member
I'm surprised not to see a post by Dirk from Japan Exposures yet!
Hello Keith!
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
So, does it use real manual focus and a double image rangefinder?
I saw the video and can't be sure...
Cheers,
Juan
I saw the video and can't be sure...
Cheers,
Juan
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
I'm ready to buy, but where is the black version?
I'm ready to buy, too, but where is the Hermes version in chartreuse ostrich skin?
gavinlg
Veteran
So, does it use real manual focus and a double image rangefinder?
I saw the video and can't be sure...
Cheers,
Juan
No. It's autofocus, and has a manual focus ring so therefor must have some sort of manual focus assist.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.