unixrevolution
Well-known
Absolutely! But I just got my Leica M, so I'm going to pretend that Fuji doesn't exist. 😡
Please forgive me for failing to muster sympathy for you.
Absolutely! But I just got my Leica M, so I'm going to pretend that Fuji doesn't exist. 😡
the x1/x20 are beauties.....and very intuitive to use....but the tiny sensor is not appealing to me 🙁.....the sony is way better but not as beautiful as the fuji....what can i do????
wait for the sigma dp4 with zoom f2.8 lens????
Absolutely aggree.
I'm strongly considering a switch from RX100, to the X20.
I already had the X10, but I just didn't like the VF being without any informations.
You don't consider the much larger body, smaller sensor and fewer pixels a hindrance?
Seems to me that, as good as both cameras are, RX100 buyers would be much more reticent to switch to the Fuji than the other way around.
Last summer I did some tests in a shop with the X10 and X100. I need an OVF (gives me smaller handling differences switching from this to RF cameras and back) and accept the bigger body for that. But when I compared the naked OVF of the X10 against the X100 the decision was clearly to pay the higher price of the X100.Absolutely aggree.
I'm strongly considering a switch from RX100, to the X20.
I already had the X10, but I just didn't like the VF being without any informations.
Last summer I did some tests in a shop with the X10 and X100. I need an OVF (gives me smaller handling differences switching from this to RF cameras and back) and accept the bigger body for that. But when I compared the naked OVF of the X10 against the X100 the decision was clearly to pay the higher price of the X100.
Now if there was already the informative OVF of the X20, I suppose I wouldn't own a X100...
20x30 printed from the RX100 (it looks fantastic...it was PP'd for a Moriyama-type film look):
![]()