I want from Fuji digital, manual focus FF RF that will accept my M lenses (I am happy with what I have in M mount) and cost less than 2000$![]()
You and every other rangefinder fan that isn't opposed to digital.
geertvn
Established
23mm/2.0 or 1.4 - no pancake, no compromise on quality. Has to be lots better than the 18mm, which I think is one of the worst system lenses I've ever used.
Eric T
Well-known
Fast zooms.
furcafe
Veteran
Ditto. A fast (aperture & focus speed, too) 35mm equivalent would be nice.
I really want a fast 23mm. The x100 23mm is tiny, so they can afford to go down to at least to f1.8, but f1.4 would be even better. If it were still fairly small, this would really set the system apart from other systems.
Also a tiny/slow wide angle like a 12mm f4 which is sharp corner to corner.
Matthieu
Member
Now that I have it with all three lenses, I think I'm good.
I just may buy a 23mm if it has a good maximum apperture, is small and focuses fast. And probably a stabilized telezoom or teleprime.
I just may buy a 23mm if it has a good maximum apperture, is small and focuses fast. And probably a stabilized telezoom or teleprime.
Gary Briggs
mamiyaDude
Do we have any idea how much the planned zooms (18-72 and 12-24) will weigh?
Any reason to think they would be over say 10 oz ?
Any reason to think they would be over say 10 oz ?
Do we have any idea how much the planned zooms (18-72 and 12-24) will weigh?
Any reason to think they would be over say 10 oz ?
I don't think anyone can answer this... and if they do, it will be a guess and not worth much. Why do they need to be below 10oz?
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
A lens that gives the same look as the Summitar.
Just want pancakes...in 21, 28, 35, 42, 50mm equivs. 
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.