Fujifilm X-Pro1 details leaked!!!

[RZetter]

I think you may be confused with the Fuji X10, not X100.

No, I'm not that confused, although I did try the X10 also.

 

[jsrockit]

No, I'm not that confused, although I did try the X10 also.

Then I don't know what happened since the X100's VF is nothing like the G series Canon. 😱

 

[Turtle]

I'm used to Leica Ms and the X100 finder is pretty darned good... Bright, clear, open...

I suspect the X Pro finder is identical.

 

[splitimageview]

First pics of the M adapter on the Fuji-xforum

 

[PrecisionCamera]

First pics of the M adapter on the Fuji-xforum

Drool. I've been trying to resist handing over all my cash and equipment for this camera, but this just made it impossible!

 

[Arjay]

Careful, folks...

The M adapter shown on the pictures may not have a cam follower which would be required to detect the lens's current focus distance. Without that information, the camera's optical viewfinder would not be able to move the bright-frame for parallax compensation. Also, the camera would not be able to calculate the in-viewfinder DoF display.

Frankie (which is active both here and on the Fuji-X forum) has provided more insights on the issue. See the referenced thread in the Fuji-X forum.

Should Fuji not make such an intelligent M adapter, Frankie might.