RZetter
Member
No, I'm not that confused, although I did try the X10 also.
Fujifilm X-Pro1 details leaked!!!
- Thread starter whtchocla7e
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 1K
- Views 168K
No, I'm not that confused, although I did try the X10 also.
Then I don't know what happened since the X100's VF is nothing like the G series Canon. 😱
Turtle
Veteran
I'm used to Leica Ms and the X100 finder is pretty darned good... Bright, clear, open...
I suspect the X Pro finder is identical.
I suspect the X Pro finder is identical.
First pics of the M adapter on the Fuji-xforum
PrecisionCamera
Precision Camera & Video
Drool. I've been trying to resist handing over all my cash and equipment for this camera, but this just made it impossible!
Arjay
Time Traveller
Careful, folks...
The M adapter shown on the pictures may not have a cam follower which would be required to detect the lens's current focus distance. Without that information, the camera's optical viewfinder would not be able to move the bright-frame for parallax compensation. Also, the camera would not be able to calculate the in-viewfinder DoF display.
Frankie (which is active both here and on the Fuji-X forum) has provided more insights on the issue. See the referenced thread in the Fuji-X forum.
Should Fuji not make such an intelligent M adapter, Frankie might.
The M adapter shown on the pictures may not have a cam follower which would be required to detect the lens's current focus distance. Without that information, the camera's optical viewfinder would not be able to move the bright-frame for parallax compensation. Also, the camera would not be able to calculate the in-viewfinder DoF display.
Frankie (which is active both here and on the Fuji-X forum) has provided more insights on the issue. See the referenced thread in the Fuji-X forum.
Should Fuji not make such an intelligent M adapter, Frankie might.