Faintandfuzzy
Well-known
the 12800 shot shows some serious banding in the upper part. and that's not really nice.
Care to try an M9 at 12800 😀
the 12800 shot shows some serious banding in the upper part. and that's not really nice.
or almost any other camera on the market? 😀Care to try an M9 at 12800 😀
ISO 12800 image samples (from other APS-C sensored cameras)
D300S:
http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d3s/sample.htm
A55V:
http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-6501_7-10005409-5.html?s=2&o=15
http://www.neocamera.com/review.php?id=148&review=samples
K-5:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/patrickdean/5322390279/
D7000:
http://www.naturapics.com/809-sample-iso-du-nikon-d7000.html
ISO 12800 image samples (from other APS-C sensored cameras)
D300S:
http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d3s/sample.htm
A55V:
http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-6501_7-10005409-5.html?s=2&o=15
http://www.neocamera.com/review.php?id=148&review=samples
K-5:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/patrickdean/5322390279/
D7000:
http://www.naturapics.com/809-sample-iso-du-nikon-d7000.html
Note - the D300s files are D3s files (wrong link?)
Hopefully, Leica can, in the M10, work with a sensor that is a bit more up to date in technology. Don't get me wrong....I think it's great. But the noise at even 2500 is nasty compared to a cheap DSLR 1/10 the cost. I get better results from my wife's Pentax K-x at 6400 than the M9 at 2500.....at less than 1/10 the cost. Different experience mind you, but you get get the point.
The X100 is a welcome addition!