GaryLH
Veteran
cidereye
Film Freak
Thanks Gary.
Could be a great way of shooting from the hip on the streets while just looking at your phone. So many possibilities using this app, just need my X-T1 to arrive now.
Could be a great way of shooting from the hip on the streets while just looking at your phone. So many possibilities using this app, just need my X-T1 to arrive now.
GaryLH
Veteran
Another writeup but this time from luminous landscape. The author was the guy w/ Chris on the video about the xt1 if I remember correctly.
The one thing he got somewhat wrong was he is not up to speed on what photo sw supports the xtrans sensor while the xt1 is not immediately supported by aperture or capture one or accuraw, etc.. Adobe is not the only one that supports it as he stated.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/fujis__x_t1___the_x_system_comes_of_age.shtml
Anyway he seems to be impressed. He was also not quite correct in terms of how many weather sealed lenses. There is a 18-135 kit lens plus the two f2.8 zooms he mentioned. If I ever get the xt1, I plan to buy it w/ that kit lens.
Gary
The one thing he got somewhat wrong was he is not up to speed on what photo sw supports the xtrans sensor while the xt1 is not immediately supported by aperture or capture one or accuraw, etc.. Adobe is not the only one that supports it as he stated.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/fujis__x_t1___the_x_system_comes_of_age.shtml
Anyway he seems to be impressed. He was also not quite correct in terms of how many weather sealed lenses. There is a 18-135 kit lens plus the two f2.8 zooms he mentioned. If I ever get the xt1, I plan to buy it w/ that kit lens.
Gary
back alley
IMAGES
the xt1 is becoming more & more attractive…i look forward to when fuji puts all of it into a xe body.
kuzano
Veteran
Can that actually happen...
Can that actually happen...
It may be that the prism is functional, not for viewing, but for space for some of the necessary components of the system.
People disliking the prism hump on the Olympus OM-D bodies are not aware that the hump houses the 5 axis IBIS.....
So aside from the rangefinder "gestalt" as noted, the retro design may not just be that... retro design. It may be purposeful/functional.
Of course, if they needed the space, they could make the "faux" rangefinder body bigger... perhaps a hump out the back and call it the "hunchback", or one end longer.
Personally, I like the SLR look and it certainly seems to be attractive to old (me) SLR users, and some of the newer crowd.
Can that actually happen...
It may be that the prism is functional, not for viewing, but for space for some of the necessary components of the system.
People disliking the prism hump on the Olympus OM-D bodies are not aware that the hump houses the 5 axis IBIS.....
So aside from the rangefinder "gestalt" as noted, the retro design may not just be that... retro design. It may be purposeful/functional.
Of course, if they needed the space, they could make the "faux" rangefinder body bigger... perhaps a hump out the back and call it the "hunchback", or one end longer.
Personally, I like the SLR look and it certainly seems to be attractive to old (me) SLR users, and some of the newer crowd.
cidereye
Film Freak
Yep, it's all gotta fit in somewhere. Still, it's a well shaped body unlike IMHO the dog ugly Sony A7.It may be that the prism is functional, not for viewing, but for space for some of the necessary components of the system.
People disliking the prism hump on the Olympus OM-D bodies are not aware that the hump houses the 5 axis IBIS.....
So aside from the rangefinder "gestalt" as noted, the retro design may not just be that... retro design. It may be purposeful/functional.
Of course, if they needed the space, they could make the "faux" rangefinder body bigger... perhaps a hump out the back and call it the "hunchback", or one end longer.
Personally, I like the SLR look and it certainly seems to be attractive to old (me) SLR users, and some of the newer crowd.
sandymc
Member
The one thing he got somewhat wrong was he is not up to speed on what photo sw supports the xtrans sensor while the xt1 is not immediately supported by aperture or capture one or accuraw, etc.. Adobe is not the only one that supports it as he stated.
AccuRaw has had X-T1 support for some weeks now.
Sandy
GaryLH
Veteran
I didn't know.. Thanks. I guess the smaller operations move faster then the big guys.
Gary
Gary
GaryLH
Veteran
Yep, it's all gotta fit in somewhere. Still, it's a well shaped body unlike IMHO the dog ugly Sony A7.
I think the Nikon df looks worst.. But everything is subjective.
Gary
bonatto
looking out
interesting to see fuji implementing all of this accessory tech. Let's see what they do with the next x-pro model.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.