Gallery Rules.

[Bertram2]

Well, it says no genitailia, so I don't see any problem there.
The human body has been the subject of great art since pre-history. Would you not take a child to an art museum because of nude paintings?

Genitalia or not would not be the question for me but if the photos put those in the center of interest I'd say no thanks.
Unfortunately at many galleries there are some photographers who do not know the limit, they speak about porographic provocation and do nothing else than simple voyeur stuff.
Don't think we need that stuff here too.

Related to the kid's question I 'd like to say that this is not a kid's gallery but an adult gallery primarily and so for me the kids are no argument.


Bertram

 

[bushwick1234]

Related to the kid's question I 'd like to say that this is not a kid's gallery but an adult gallery primarily and so for me the kids are no argument.

The issue with nudity in the gallery is that when kids are at home you sit in the living room with your laptop and go to the Gallery to see photographs or read/write comments and first thing that pops up is a nude female. That is the kids argument so far and it is valid. US laws regarding 'child molestation' is very broad and includes not to expose them to nudity.