batterytypehah!
Lord of the Dings
I'll be spending a week in Bryce, Zion, Grand Canyon, Lake Powell at the end of this month. This will be my first time shooting in desert/canyon landscapes, and there won't be another opportunity anytime soon. So, I'm a little nervous about the outfit and film to bring along.
Current kit:
Contax IIa, uncoated Sonnar 5cm/f2, coated Jupiter 13.5/4
Sears KS-2 (aka Ricoh XR-7), Pentax SMC 28/2.8
Zeca Goldi 3x4
Compact digicam for snapshots
Plus a 6x9 folder to be named later
The Contax is to be my main camera, but I don't own a wide, nor do I trust my metering skills and equipment for situations such as Antelope Canyon. Hence the Sears which has an electronic shutter that goes up to 16 seconds. It'll also serve as meter for the others.
Film:
The Goldi is going to be loaded with Efke 100 because nothing else is available in 127. This covers my b&w needs. I would prefer to shoot slide film in the Contax and Sears -- ideally the same, for ease of metering and scanning/presenting them mixed. (Yeah, I know, three very different lenses. Won't be a very unified look.)
The 6x9 will probably spend the entire trip set to infinity and stopped down. I want to shoot some 6x9 slides just for the heck of it, and for the looks you get when you explain that a 60 year old camera takes 100 MP shots 🙂
Ideas? Glaring omissions? I'm contemplating taking a 28-80 zoom for the Sears instead but I'd have to find one first, and it might be too darn tempting to just shoot everything with the SLR then. Or should I look for a 24mm lens? I understand a 28 barely captures the view at Horseshoe Bend.
Film is my main concern. In addition to the landscapes, I'm hoping for a lot of portrait opportunities with my (fair-skinned) fellow travelers. I'm generally more comfortable with 100 or 200 speed. (I don't anticipate any action shots and low light will be handled by the Sears on a tripod.) I haven't shot chrome since the nineties, though. I preferred Fujichrome back then, whichever the consumer flavor was at the time, but have no idea which current emulsion comes close to that. Besides, that was all in very different lighting and landscape situations, and through a Color-Skopar.
I was literally about to take the plunge and go Kodachrome, which I've never shot before, when their decision was announced and prices went through the roof. I think I'm going to generously leave the remaining stock to those who know it better 🙂
All other things being equal, I would go for the more economical film, but then all other things are never equal, are they? It's a special trip and a half dozen 36 exp. rolls is not going to break the budget either way.
Thanks for your patience!
Current kit:
Contax IIa, uncoated Sonnar 5cm/f2, coated Jupiter 13.5/4
Sears KS-2 (aka Ricoh XR-7), Pentax SMC 28/2.8
Zeca Goldi 3x4
Compact digicam for snapshots
Plus a 6x9 folder to be named later
The Contax is to be my main camera, but I don't own a wide, nor do I trust my metering skills and equipment for situations such as Antelope Canyon. Hence the Sears which has an electronic shutter that goes up to 16 seconds. It'll also serve as meter for the others.
Film:
The Goldi is going to be loaded with Efke 100 because nothing else is available in 127. This covers my b&w needs. I would prefer to shoot slide film in the Contax and Sears -- ideally the same, for ease of metering and scanning/presenting them mixed. (Yeah, I know, three very different lenses. Won't be a very unified look.)
The 6x9 will probably spend the entire trip set to infinity and stopped down. I want to shoot some 6x9 slides just for the heck of it, and for the looks you get when you explain that a 60 year old camera takes 100 MP shots 🙂
Ideas? Glaring omissions? I'm contemplating taking a 28-80 zoom for the Sears instead but I'd have to find one first, and it might be too darn tempting to just shoot everything with the SLR then. Or should I look for a 24mm lens? I understand a 28 barely captures the view at Horseshoe Bend.
Film is my main concern. In addition to the landscapes, I'm hoping for a lot of portrait opportunities with my (fair-skinned) fellow travelers. I'm generally more comfortable with 100 or 200 speed. (I don't anticipate any action shots and low light will be handled by the Sears on a tripod.) I haven't shot chrome since the nineties, though. I preferred Fujichrome back then, whichever the consumer flavor was at the time, but have no idea which current emulsion comes close to that. Besides, that was all in very different lighting and landscape situations, and through a Color-Skopar.
I was literally about to take the plunge and go Kodachrome, which I've never shot before, when their decision was announced and prices went through the roof. I think I'm going to generously leave the remaining stock to those who know it better 🙂
All other things being equal, I would go for the more economical film, but then all other things are never equal, are they? It's a special trip and a half dozen 36 exp. rolls is not going to break the budget either way.
Thanks for your patience!