gone digital? in my dreams...

back alley

IMAGES
Local time
11:51 AM
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
41,288
Location
true north strong & free
what a weird dream i had last night...just remembering it now.

not sure where or how, but i was out shooting...with a wiz bang auto everything digital camera...and i was really liking it!!

i remember feeling like i was betraying my roots but i really liked that digital.

i liked that i was gonna head home and just download some pics, no nasty chemicals involved. and that i would be photoshopping them and posting them within minutes instead of hours or days (my usual).

so very weird.


could have something to do with processing 9 rolls of film this past few days and still have 2 more to go. a few of them from new york this past summer.
and soon to be heading out to shoot a couple more.

rd-1 in my future...?

joe
 
"Say it ain't so, Joe.." - young lad to Shoeless Joe Jackson

Actually, why not get yourself a digital P&S to play with the mode? I did that a few years ago. Of course then it was a D-70 and now I'm looking lustily at a D-200!

It's fun to "play around" once in a while. And I'm certain you will return to your lifetime partner after a brief fling. 🙂
 
I'm saving money for something. I don't know if it will be an R2S with Heliar and a couple of lenses; an S3-2000; or an RD-1.

Or a Canon 35/1.5 and 100/2.

What's really scary is I've been following some Voigtlander Prominent auctions. A real Nokton.
 
Why don't you try your friend's 7D (from the 'serious' thread)? You may like it.
 
Floyd Takeuchi said:
The January-February issue of National Geographic Traveler showed up yesterday. It is the "All Digital Photo Issue." What was particularly interesting was a double-gatefold special section featuring eight pro photographers and how/why they've made the transition to digital shooting. One of the photographers featured in the Q/A format article is David Allen Harvey, tne National Geographic photographer known for shooting with Leicas and a couple pf primes. There have been stories elsewhere about his growing interest in digital shooting. But I was still surprised when I read his answer to how he began shooting digital for publication:

"I shot the story on Nairobi for the September 2005 National Geographic digitally. Before that was an ad campaign in Oaxaca, Mexico. In 48 hours, I literally went from a whole career of shooting film and never having held a digital camera to falling in love with digital. I haven't shot film since. That surprises me, my colleagues, everybody. Of course, I teach a lot, and I've met photographers in their 20s who've never used a film camera."

The article also notes that Harvey shot the Nairobi package with a sub-$1,000 prosumer digital SLR and a "couple of fixed focus lenses."


Sounds like Harvey is going through the thrilling early days of a romance. I would imagine just about every working photographer these days needs to have digital capabilities.

But that doesn't mean amateurs like myself cannot have fun with film.

Now, I'm signing out of this thread because it's about to turn into one of those
"digital vs. film", "film is dead" etc. etc. things that I've become so weary of.......
 
back alley said:
what a weird dream i had last night...i liked that i was gonna head home and just download some pics, no nasty chemicals involved. and that i would be photoshopping them and posting them within minutes instead of hours or days (my usual).

In the realm of reality, as opposed to the realm of dreams, you'd better figure on Photoshopping for hours or days... assuming you care about the quality of your results.

Also, while the chemicals involved in processing can be nasty from a health aspect, RSIs (repetitive strain injuries) from too many hours at the computer are pretty nasty too. During the past year I've spent a lot more time at the keyboard than in the past, both for work- and photography-related reasons; one consequence of this is that I now can't raise my arms above my head without intense pain in my shoulders.

There's a lot to be said for shooting digitally -- but don't make the mistake of assuming that it will be easier or require less time and effort. I know I've said this before, but I'll say it again: the amount of time and effort you have to spend on your photography is determined by your commitment level, not by the way you capture your images.
 
copake_ham said:
"Say it ain't so, Joe.." - young lad to Shoeless Joe Jackson

Actually, why not get yourself a digital P&S to play with the mode? I did that a few years ago. Of course then it was a D-70 and now I'm looking lustily at a D-200!

It's fun to "play around" once in a while. And I'm certain you will return to your lifetime partner after a brief fling. 🙂
Ham,
Thanks for supporting me on the other thread, that grandpa Huck acts like a Zeiss Nazi (not the real one but like that Soup Nazi on SEINFELD show). And he is the one who's spreading vicious lies about CameraQuest selling ZeissIkon 'rejects' smuggled out by dishonest Japanese Cosina workers. Of course, busy Mr. Gandy scolded him on the same thread later on. I assume that he is selling some Zeiss gear and we are cutting into his profit.
I though this forum is for rangefinder talkings only?
I jsut bough the Panasonic FX-9($350) a 6 MP camera, because of the Leica lens. 2 months early a Fuji F10(also $350 and 6 MP) because it's cute. Before F10, a KMinolta S414( $300), a 4 MP but bigger 1/1.8 inch sensor, w an excellent Minolta GT lens(35-140mm Eqv.), before that, a bunch of 1,2,3 MP Canon or Taiwan's own BenQ (lots of Japanese OEM P&S was made by BenQ) cameras.
I am going to get Fuji E500 in a few days now, because of the 28-90mm( equv.). These stuff is great for street shooting. I work for several magazines, other than manual Nikon, manual Canon gear, I use two film EOS, because I am so familiar w them.
Digital P&S can do without question, double page layout and fool you, are these pictures taken with D70 or Rebel XT.
When I want to buy digital Rebel, the D70 came out(which is a hit), then, XT came out, then D70S, then D50, now, answer to D50, Canon may come out w something already, I just have to headed to the Camera districts (about a hundred stores or so around 3, 4 blocks here also across town a district selling digitals only).
Wait, because I also have a bunch of Pentax lenses, I may want to get Pentax ist*-D, (I hate the name) Pentax lenses are excellent, there is a Pentax manufacture company in Taiwan called Cosmicar ( if Pentax is GM, Cosmicar is Olds or Pontiac something), I'll get a 24, or 20 2.8., Now, *ist-D-S, came out, then *ist-D-L came out, I hate to buy it and another *ist-D-L-X came out when I got home.
Olympus just for sale the E-500 w two lenses, Zuiko lenses performs excellently if you want to compare them to leica, one Japanese photographer Iwago Mitsuaki, he shot a series of Morocco sheep and people with Leica R 6.2 and bunch of R lenses along w OM 4-Ti Zuiko 21mm, 28mm 2.8, no one can tell the diffience.
E-500 plus two Zuiko lenses ,$1,200. Then, Sony came out with the big sensor R-1( Aps-C, I am not touching full frame yet because it's too expensive now, and I don't need the weight for my work), the lens on it is ZEISS 14.3-71.5mm f2.8-4.8(24-120mm equv.) Vario-Sonnar,OMG. and one of my favorite beautiful female photographer Orisaku Mineko( book/Colorful Shanghai )is using it. So I think I should get the R-1(street $1,000), and hope R-2 won't be out tomorrow!
Digital is FUN!
Joe, Coolpix 4600's only $179 or less, excellent for street work, shutter lag? so you get 0.3 sec after decisive moment...ha ha ha...
well, You may get laid when you buy that KBCamera $8,500 M7... the girl is going to leave you for some other man with R9-digital back or digital M guy anyway...
 
vincentbenoit said:
Sure... Only a digital camera can feature a "fixed focus" lens. 😀

Hey, I've got a fixed focus lens -- it didn't used to focus, but Essex was able to fix it!
 
Yesterday we took the kids to an indoor playground. Since I recently charged the battery of my Panasonic DMC-LC5, I took it with me. I didn't get 1 good shot. It's only usable at asa 100 or 200 and F2 at the widest end of the zoom wasn't enough for available light shots. I tried shooting with flash, but the autofocus system was too slow for the fast action of playing kids. The LC5 has manual focus, but I never managed to get any good results due to the cluncky interface. After a few frustrating attempts, I decided that I would only use it anymore for good weather pics outside, or for still life shots inside. I know the LC5 is an oldie in digital camera terms, and I know there are newer and better cameras, but I think I'll stick with film for the next 2 years. Then I might be tempted by an R-D2, a digital Zeiss Ikon, or even a Digital M.

Wim
 
Back
Top Bottom