vdonovan
Vince Donovan
Someone said in another thread that most of Kodak's profits come from film. The most recent Kodak financial press release shows that this is true. Even though film sales were down, profits were up in the film division last quarter:
"Fourth-quarter earnings from operations [of the Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group] increased to $39 million from $17 million in the year-ago quarter. "
It's digital that really fell off a cliff and is posting a big loss:
"Fourth-quarter loss from [the Consumer Digital Imaging Group] was $40 million, compared with earnings of $91 million in the year-ago quarter. "
If Kodak didn't have a film division, their overall corporate loss would be even bigger than it is. AND film actually delivered profits even through sales decreased. Somewhere, the vice president of the Kodak film division is firing up a big fat cigar. His job is secure for a few more years.
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=2709&pq-locale=en_US&gpcid=0900688a80a51309
"Fourth-quarter earnings from operations [of the Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group] increased to $39 million from $17 million in the year-ago quarter. "
It's digital that really fell off a cliff and is posting a big loss:
"Fourth-quarter loss from [the Consumer Digital Imaging Group] was $40 million, compared with earnings of $91 million in the year-ago quarter. "
If Kodak didn't have a film division, their overall corporate loss would be even bigger than it is. AND film actually delivered profits even through sales decreased. Somewhere, the vice president of the Kodak film division is firing up a big fat cigar. His job is secure for a few more years.
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=2709&pq-locale=en_US&gpcid=0900688a80a51309
Last edited:
R
ruben
Guest
Ok, I am pissed off! am going to check what about Foma !
FA Limited
missing in action
read some of the fuji discussion
http://rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=69392
http://rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=69392
bmattock
Veteran
You did not post what came next - why the number was increased. Come on, be honest - why was the number up?
Oh, they said why.
They cut costs. They had to. If sales decline (they did) and prices do not rise (they did rise, but not by much), then costs have to drop.
And how did they cut those costs?
Layoffs. Cuts in benefits. Cuts in benefits paid to retirees. They even went back and decided to change how they depreciated the cost of their factories over time, to get a few more years use out of them (they had previously depreciated them to zero, end of life).
That's called burning the furniture for firewood. You can do it once, maybe a couple times. Then you can't do it anymore.
The 'profit' as you call it, is illusory. It is paper tricks, smoke and mirrors.
The tale is simpler and easier to understand. Revenue declined some 27%, while digital revenue declined 24%. That's better than Fuji - their film division dropped over 40% in revenue.
What will they do next year, if they had to do this to 'make a profit' this year? They can lay off more employees, but they're down to the bone now. Soon, they'll affect production of the product they can sell. They can't keep cutting benefits to retirees, and they can't keep changing how they depreciate their factories.
And in the end, EK stock dropped like a rock today.
http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ig&q=EK
Kodak is one company, after all. Film, digital, they will sink or swim as one company.
And if they spun off film, since it 'makes a profit'? It still has 30% declining sales, year-on-year. That hasn't changed. So it drops, and drops, and drops, and then...nada.
And Kodak responded to the news by announcing another round of employee firings. From a high of something like 148,000 employees, they now have something like 14,000, and they're letting another 10 to 12 percent go.
Nobody in Rochester is wearing a big happy hat tonight.
dfoo
Well-known
You do realize that, again, this makes zero sense right? Among other things GAAP does not permit that.
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
dfoo, if you are an investor in EK, the only think that matters is:
"ROCHESTER (AP) — The Eastman Kodak Company said Thursday it was cutting 3,500 to 4,500 jobs, or 14 percent to 18 percent of its work force, as it posted a fourth-quarter loss of $137 million on plunging sales of both digital and film-based photography products. Its stock tumbled nearly 30 percent."
Which is why the stock tanked.
"ROCHESTER (AP) — The Eastman Kodak Company said Thursday it was cutting 3,500 to 4,500 jobs, or 14 percent to 18 percent of its work force, as it posted a fourth-quarter loss of $137 million on plunging sales of both digital and film-based photography products. Its stock tumbled nearly 30 percent."
Which is why the stock tanked.
dfoo
Well-known
I'm not disputing that.
bmattock
Veteran
http://www.streetinsider.com/Press+...dress+Impact+of+Global+Recession/4339384.html
Bam. Tell it to the IRS, I didn't make the rules.
As well:
Just as I said. They 'made a profit' by cutting retiree benefits and jiggering the books. One-time deal, for the most part.
Last edited:
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
Or, that "In all of 2008, Kodak earned $339 million, or $1.20 a share, down 50 percent from $676 million, or $2.35 a share, in 2007."
That's a 50 percent drop in one year. Doesn't really matter what division is doing what. They can't survive very long with this kind of performance.
That's a 50 percent drop in one year. Doesn't really matter what division is doing what. They can't survive very long with this kind of performance.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I'm not suprised they can't make any money out of digital. I've had three Kodak digitals and none of them have lasted beyond a year or so. My current Canon A620 P+S which I've had for three years has been dropped several times and generally treated very poorly ... but it just doesn't quit.
Kodak make great film!
Kodak make great film!
Pickett Wilson
Veteran
I miss Polycontrast III.
dfoo
Well-known
There goes that precision again... You can see how its hard to follow your shifting, mostly imprecise reasoning, right?
bmattock
Veteran
We are now in FY 2009. It would have been the last year for depreciation - meaning it has (or would have) gone to zero.
And it's picking nits. My points are correct and you know it.
Rey
Well-known
This may sound counter intuitive, but I think that Kodak is on the right track. There is a market for film, there are still millions of film users out there. Unfortunately, it's not the market it was a decade ago, when there were hundreds of millions of film consumers. So what is Kodak to do, they have to keep cutting down costs until they hit an equilibrium, that is until the amount of film they produce comes close to matching consumption. What has to happen is that digital has to stop eating into film consumption, which should happen soon, especially in this world recession. Anyone in China or latin america who could almost afford digital last year (including camera, computer, printer, ink, and software, will likely be unable to make the jump now. The question is, will Fuji and Kodak (as film giants) be able to hang on until they can reach the equilibrium point, or will their debts overwhelm them, like Agfa? It would also be nice to see a breakdown as to what films are selling and what not, especially in terms of Black & white vs. color, print vs. slide. I wonder how some of the smaller B&W specialty film producers are managing?
George S.
How many is enough?
Just about every company is cutting costs in exactly the same way Kodak is. Every company does it once or twice if they are able to. No big news or "the end is near" hysterics here. They still made money. Good. Maybe they won't make money in five years, maybe they will. Film will be a smaller market with higher prices which may actually help the profit potential, as already stated they've long since paid for the R&D and the equipment.
The auto makers are losing billions each quarter, not making money as Fuji and Kodak are and are cost-cutting in even more drastic ways, but cars will still be available in 5 years, nobody's disputing that. I know that the cars and film industries are not the same, but at least film is still making money for the firms. Let's not overlook that fact and presume Kodak and Fuji are dead.
The auto makers are losing billions each quarter, not making money as Fuji and Kodak are and are cost-cutting in even more drastic ways, but cars will still be available in 5 years, nobody's disputing that. I know that the cars and film industries are not the same, but at least film is still making money for the firms. Let's not overlook that fact and presume Kodak and Fuji are dead.
Last edited:
bmattock
Veteran
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7013899501
I'm sorry, they lost money, they did not make money. EK is one entity. EK lost 137 million dollars in the 4th quarter of 2008. That's all there is to it. Their stock tanked.
When the books are tallied, what one division inside Kodak did versus another doesn't matter - it is Eastman Kodak as an entity that makes a profit or loss.
Gumby
Veteran
Good for who... the execs who will get a big bonus, or the workers who are standing in unemployment lines trying to get some financial support from another bankrupt system?
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
McDonald's profits are up. This means this is the beginning of the end for vegetables!!
No, wait: vegetable profits are up. This mean it's the beginning of the end for McDonald's!
Points for the one who can spot a flaw in either argument.
No, wait: vegetable profits are up. This mean it's the beginning of the end for McDonald's!
Points for the one who can spot a flaw in either argument.
Gumby
Veteran
Perhaps the flaw is that one can get just as good of a look into the future with a magic-8 ball as with the crystal balls we now use???
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Well, plastics nowadays have well-known carcinogenics, and crystal is made with lead, so either one is really really bad :bang: