daveleo
what?
I'd grade myself as pretty tolerant when it comes to living with cameras, and somewhat tolerant regarding lenses. (I was not always so tolerant, but am now.) In fact I get somewhat intrigued (rather than put off) by the funky behavior of some stuff I own.
It is easy to observe (here on RFF and every other place) that some photographers are much more adaptable, tolerant, forgiving of their cameras and lenses than are others. Some people gush about the "character" of their old (imperfect) lenses, while others b#tch about how imperfect their new lenses are. Some people embrace "cultish" hardware readily, while others can't tolerate quirky behavior or equipment that "leaves its signature".
To each his own, I am sure. But, if I may ask . . . how would you classify yourself on this topic? Do you embrace the quirks or "character" traits of your hardware or do you dump it?
It is easy to observe (here on RFF and every other place) that some photographers are much more adaptable, tolerant, forgiving of their cameras and lenses than are others. Some people gush about the "character" of their old (imperfect) lenses, while others b#tch about how imperfect their new lenses are. Some people embrace "cultish" hardware readily, while others can't tolerate quirky behavior or equipment that "leaves its signature".
To each his own, I am sure. But, if I may ask . . . how would you classify yourself on this topic? Do you embrace the quirks or "character" traits of your hardware or do you dump it?