j j
Well-known
Didn't Leica make a Ghostbusters special edition M6?
has anyone ever tried to photograph a ghost?
- Thread starter Hjortsberg
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 88
- Views 8K
mugent
Well-known
Some people have faith in ghosts and the paranormal, some have faith in god/Jesus/spaghetti monster, all are equally unproven, so maybe we should give them all the benefit of the doubt, or dismiss all of them with the same judgemental piss taking in this thread?
bronney
Established
Just some suggestions. Use a wide angle on your main camera, you shouldn't know where the ghost will appear. Bring a second camera with a 50 or a tele on it for a nice bokeh after you spot a ghost.
Don't bother telling "it" to cheese, and don't flash. Flash doesn't work on smokey objects unless you flash it from the back but since you don't know where it'll appear it's best to avoid flash altogether. Though, if you shoot indoor it might be possible to bounce. Don't gel though.
I've also heard a rumour that, ghosts generally don't like to imprint themselves on digital sensors. I have not been able to confirm this as I don't shoot ghosts. But you might want to bring a film body just in case. Stay away from black and white films as that's over used for ghost photos. Feed some portra or ektar (depending on lighting available) in it if your client's got the budget. Else, Fuji's not bad for some cheap action.
Don't worry about skin tone, they are usually pale looking. Actually, most of them come in white, so some Reala 100's would really bring it home. Pro400H isn't bad to shoot pale things either.
If you don't plan to shoot videos along with it, don't use interval shooting. Ghosts are generally nefarious and will appear between your shots just to spite you. Even the fps of a Nikon D4 won't help you. You must be ready to shoot it by hand. After all, the ghost was there to meet you, not your tripod interval shooting toy.
And if you must take a bio break, I suggest always face the east.
Don't bother telling "it" to cheese, and don't flash. Flash doesn't work on smokey objects unless you flash it from the back but since you don't know where it'll appear it's best to avoid flash altogether. Though, if you shoot indoor it might be possible to bounce. Don't gel though.
I've also heard a rumour that, ghosts generally don't like to imprint themselves on digital sensors. I have not been able to confirm this as I don't shoot ghosts. But you might want to bring a film body just in case. Stay away from black and white films as that's over used for ghost photos. Feed some portra or ektar (depending on lighting available) in it if your client's got the budget. Else, Fuji's not bad for some cheap action.
Don't worry about skin tone, they are usually pale looking. Actually, most of them come in white, so some Reala 100's would really bring it home. Pro400H isn't bad to shoot pale things either.
If you don't plan to shoot videos along with it, don't use interval shooting. Ghosts are generally nefarious and will appear between your shots just to spite you. Even the fps of a Nikon D4 won't help you. You must be ready to shoot it by hand. After all, the ghost was there to meet you, not your tripod interval shooting toy.
And if you must take a bio break, I suggest always face the east.
pvdhaar
Peter
First of all, I agree with rxmd.. it's an assignment that to me sounds very much like a lose-lose situation and one which I would be hesitant to take. But if you've decided to follow through with it, there are some things that you can do to mitigate the risk of the customer ending up unhappy.
Most important is to have the customer's OK that you're getting paid for the effort, not for the result. Then make a detailed plan (describing gear, set-up, time, approach etc) that tells what actions you do (e.g. "fire camera every 30 seconds"), and not in terms of outcome (e.g. "shoot ghost") and have that plan approved (in writing preferably).
As far as gear is concerned, a Wildlife camera (e.g. http://www.vegaoptics.de/Wildkamera-Doerr-Snapshot-MINI_c721_p5363_x2.htm ) is able to shoot stills and live video following an IR trigger, and may convince your customer that you're serious about your assignment..
fireblade
Vincenzo.
😀
literiter
Well-known
If there are ghosts, they will only exist within ones mind. You can't photograph a dream either!
Outside of this there has never, and I mean never, been any real hard evidence for the spirit world and yet some of us still insist it is somewhere out there.
It isn't!
But if you insist, use film, it may be considered better evidence.
Outside of this there has never, and I mean never, been any real hard evidence for the spirit world and yet some of us still insist it is somewhere out there.
It isn't!
But if you insist, use film, it may be considered better evidence.
agour
Established
take a photo of an empty building, then use photoshop to 'find' the ghosts
gliderbee
Well-known
Did we already reach a conclusion about the situation of the living dead ?
gliderbee
Well-known
I can agree with this: it's as unscientific to say they don't exist as to say they exist. It's all unproven (I'm an agnostic).
BUT why wouldn't we discuss it and have some fun discussing it ? The other subjects you mention are also often discussed in the same way ... I don't really consider it "judgmental piss taking", I don't read any malicious intentions in the comments.
mugent
Well-known
Agreed, we *should* discuss it, I just wonder if people would be as comfortable mocking Islam or Christianity. For the record, I don't believe in ghosts.
S.H.
Picture taker
This thread made my day.
On a more serious note, I like what dotur said : that is why I am not comfortable taking or looking at pictures of people. I always end up thinking that dead people are staring at me in the face. I do not like family albums for that reason.
It is really dumb, I know ... :bang:
On a more serious note, I like what dotur said : that is why I am not comfortable taking or looking at pictures of people. I always end up thinking that dead people are staring at me in the face. I do not like family albums for that reason.
It is really dumb, I know ... :bang:
gliderbee
Well-known
hipsterdufus
Photographer?
I can't believe this whole thread went without mentioning the Noctilux. 😀 Everyone knows that people only see ghosts in the dark. Daylight spooks 'em, apparently.
So yeah, Sony Nex 5n for the high ISO, plus the Noctilux. That's my suggestion.
So yeah, Sony Nex 5n for the high ISO, plus the Noctilux. That's my suggestion.
Joosep
Well-known
We have digital cameras.
Consider how much technological achievements are in there.
We have GPS, satellites, we have been on the moon.
We have cloned a sheep.
And still we discuss things like this ?
If spirits exist and we cannot scientifically prove they exist. Then they have no measurable physical properties (i.e. they do not exist in our "reality"). If everything (vision, smell,..., love, hate, ideas...) can be measured, then they cannot interact with us. Thus even if they exist, it would not change a thing and you cannot take a pictures of them.
Consider how much technological achievements are in there.
We have GPS, satellites, we have been on the moon.
We have cloned a sheep.
And still we discuss things like this ?
If spirits exist and we cannot scientifically prove they exist. Then they have no measurable physical properties (i.e. they do not exist in our "reality"). If everything (vision, smell,..., love, hate, ideas...) can be measured, then they cannot interact with us. Thus even if they exist, it would not change a thing and you cannot take a pictures of them.
Sejanus.Aelianus
Veteran
Oddly enough, I once had to photograph a corpse. It was for an Indian family who wanted to send the picture to relatives, back in the home village. Different people, different strokes.
Wouter
Well-known
I live in Brazil. Lots of people here believe in the paranormal and/or various religious phenomena, one not excluding the other. I've learned to take this seriously. Why ? Not because it's true or not. But because the fact that so many people take this for real creates facts in social life that we have to deal with: it leads to opinions, judgements, interpretations, conducts and behaviours. So maybe, as I believe to be the case with the existence of God or not, the actual truth is irrelevant - what matters is what we as society do with these beliefs, how we create them and what they lead to.
But this is a long way from photographing ghosts, I'm sorry. Lots of pics exist though from people incorporating spirits and/or godlike creatures. The 'carriers' all say that they're taken over in their trances.
My wife did a PhD on faith healing here in the northeast. You'd be surprised on how many people, including all kind of academics, state they've been healed by spiritual surgery.
Moral: don't be too sceptic. It's not all Descartes out there.
But this is a long way from photographing ghosts, I'm sorry. Lots of pics exist though from people incorporating spirits and/or godlike creatures. The 'carriers' all say that they're taken over in their trances.
My wife did a PhD on faith healing here in the northeast. You'd be surprised on how many people, including all kind of academics, state they've been healed by spiritual surgery.
Moral: don't be too sceptic. It's not all Descartes out there.
pinkarmy
Well-known
now i must recommend the Manoel de Oliveira film The Strange Case Of Angelica (2010)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1282153/
http://youtu.be/DcJX60srLGA
Jack Conrad
Well-known
Every photo I take has at least one ghost in it.
They aren't easy to see, though. You need to look very closely.
Some are naked.
They aren't easy to see, though. You need to look very closely.
Some are naked.
Pablito
coco frío
ghosts are extremely uncooperative.
folks have been trying to photograph them since the invention of photography and no one has come up with a real clear solid image - always there are alternative explanations. ghosts can outsmart silly human photographers, and it may be a bit arrogant on your part to think you can do what so many others have failed at.
ghosts, spirits and auras have a way of showing up in images by accident - when the photographer has other motives. personally I am agnostic, but I have seen very strong evidence of this in amateur photographs, taken by practitioners, of certain vodou-like rituals.
folks have been trying to photograph them since the invention of photography and no one has come up with a real clear solid image - always there are alternative explanations. ghosts can outsmart silly human photographers, and it may be a bit arrogant on your part to think you can do what so many others have failed at.
ghosts, spirits and auras have a way of showing up in images by accident - when the photographer has other motives. personally I am agnostic, but I have seen very strong evidence of this in amateur photographs, taken by practitioners, of certain vodou-like rituals.
Similar threads
