Do you like the EV lock on Hasseblad C lenses,
or would you prefer to remove the EV lock in a CLA?
or would you prefer to remove the EV lock in a CLA?
I would put a third item in the poll ... "Don't care."
G
I never use it maybe because I don’t meter by EV readings so the feature is just in the way.
The question is not really “do you like EV lock or not”, but rather do you like the way it’s implemented on Hasselblad’s older Carl Zeiss C lenses. In particular, on those lenses, the locking of aperture and shutter speed rings is the default. To change aperture or shutter speed independently of the other then requires you to pull back the tab and adjust one of the rings.
On the CF lenses, the default is to have the lock off, but you can then push a button to get both rings to turn and stay at the same EV. In my opinion, this latter method is much more convenient.
A few other German cameras, such as the Voigtländer Bessamatic, have this same default-locked-EV on their lenses. On the Rolleiflex, at least on my 2.8D, I can choose whether to lock or not by pressing-in and turning the dial. So, best of both worlds there.
The question is not really “do you like EV lock or not”, but rather do you like the way it’s implemented on Hasselblad’s older Carl Zeiss C lenses. In particular, on those lenses, the locking of aperture and shutter speed rings is the default. To change aperture or shutter speed independently of the other then requires you to pull back the tab and adjust one of the rings.
On the CF lenses, the default is to have the lock off, but you can then push a button to get both rings to turn and stay at the same EV. In my opinion, this latter method is much more convenient.
A few other German cameras, such as the Voigtländer Bessamatic, have this same default-locked-EV on their lenses. On the Rolleiflex, at least on my 2.8D, I can choose whether to lock or not by pressing-in and turning the dial. So, best of both worlds there.