raid
Dad Photographer
I have enjoyed using my SWC for the first time this weekend. I love the small size of the camera, and I find it very natural for me to use it. I don't know how the first two rolls will come out, but I am feeling very good about this camera.
I used the 220 back for 24 exposures and the 120 back for 12 exposures today. I did not bother with a neck strap and I did not use the ground glass back either.
I know that RFF has several SWC users. How do you feel about using your SWC cameras?
I used the 220 back for 24 exposures and the 120 back for 12 exposures today. I did not bother with a neck strap and I did not use the ground glass back either.
I know that RFF has several SWC users. How do you feel about using your SWC cameras?
FrankS
Registered User
I feel envious.

benlees
Well-known
I, too, am envious. I settled for a Bronica with the 40mm. A tank that thing is!
FrankS
Registered User
Yeah, I settled for a Distagon 40.
raid
Dad Photographer
Frank,
I nearly bought an SWC here in Pensacola over twenty years ago. I did not have the money then for such a purchase.
The camera just feels solid, and the feeling of using. Lens such as the 38mm Biogon is priceless. I will experiment with it. I took portraits from a distance of three feet, and i took photos of the white beach too.
People are not alerted by the SWC. They find it "very interesting".
I nearly bought an SWC here in Pensacola over twenty years ago. I did not have the money then for such a purchase.
The camera just feels solid, and the feeling of using. Lens such as the 38mm Biogon is priceless. I will experiment with it. I took portraits from a distance of three feet, and i took photos of the white beach too.
People are not alerted by the SWC. They find it "very interesting".
FrankS
Registered User
The SWC is a camera I have not (yet) owned.

raid
Dad Photographer
I also have a ( light) Graflex XLSW with a 47mm Schneider lens. It is awkward to change aperture and speed without wearing glasses. The lens shows lots of curvature.
The SWC is very easy to operate.
The SWC is very easy to operate.
raid
Dad Photographer
The SWC is a camera I have not (yet) owned.
![]()
Frank,
You will absolutely love this camera. It may be a Leica killer!
T
Todd.Hanz
Guest
Yeah, I settled for a Distagon 40.
me too, it rocks!



glad I did, great lens!
Todd
ChrisN
Striving
It is a wonderful camera in the hand. I use mine with the thin leather neck-strap, but the strap is there merely to let me hang it from my shoulder while changing film. It is so easy and quick to use: set hyperfocal distance, set exposure, and you're in snapshot mode. Keeping the vertical lines vertical in the frame (when desired) is a knack that has to be learned. And you're right that people find it an interesting camera - even one of the security guards at our Parliament House asked me "Is that a Hasselblad?" and wanted to have a play with it. 
raid
Dad Photographer
Buying the Distagon makes sense if you have several lenses for your Hasselblad. I want to use the SWC as a small and light street photogrphy camera on the go.me too, it rocks!
glad I did, great lens!
Todd
FrankS
Registered User
me too, it rocks!
![]()
![]()
![]()
glad I did, great lens!
Todd
Oh, I'm happy too:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=191870
But I'd still pick up an SWC given the right circumstances.
raid
Dad Photographer
It is a wonderful camera in the hand. I use mine with the thin leather neck-strap, but the strap is there merely to let me hang it from my shoulder while changing film. It is so easy and quick to use: set hyperfocal distance, set exposure, and you're in snapshot mode. Keeping the vertical lines vertical in the frame (when desired) is a knack that has to be learned. And you're right that people find it an interesting camera - even one of the security guards at our Parliament House asked me "Is that a Hasselblad?" and wanted to have a play with it.![]()
Hi Chris,
Having a neckstrap for film changing makes sense. Maybe I should look for one.
rawhead
Established
I went from a Super Wide C, to a SWC/M, to a 903SWC. It's the most utilized film camera I have; never leave home without it:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=biogon&w=88929764@N00&s=int
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=biogon&w=88929764@N00&s=int
Nokton48
Veteran
Yeah, I settled for a Distagon 40.
I also "settled" for the Distagon 40mm C T* Black, and I'm glad I did.
The issue with the Superwide C's, is that the viewfinder is not -completely- accurate when doing precise near-far relationship photos. Friends of mine, who own Superwides, have complained to me, about spoiled photos due to this parallax-effect. Moving a foot or two at close distances, makes a huge difference. Perhaps that is why they make the groundglass accessories?
The 40mm Distagon and SLR viewing in the 500C/M has none of this effect, although it is alot to lug around, no doubt.
Hopefully this does not prove to be an issue for you. Sure, I would LOVE to have a black T* SWC/M. It's about all I don't have in Hasselblad at this point.
raid
Dad Photographer
Is there a review on the Distagon, and compared with the Biogon?
FrozenInTime
Well-known
I been through both the 40mm CF and ended up with the SWC/M.
I agree with what's been said :
For composition the 40mm is more accurate; I also prefer the top down viewing afforded by the WLF. But due to the weight and bulk I never carried it when travelling or up any mountains. So I sold it and a few years later found an early SWC/M CF at a great price.
The SWC makes for the perfect MF backpacking and travel camera.
These days, I'm lazy and find the 21mm on a M9 crops square to the same view as the SWC and in doing so provides the perspective shift so often desired.
However I do often dream of returning to the darkroom and printing perfect frames from the SWC complete with double V rebate
I agree with what's been said :
For composition the 40mm is more accurate; I also prefer the top down viewing afforded by the WLF. But due to the weight and bulk I never carried it when travelling or up any mountains. So I sold it and a few years later found an early SWC/M CF at a great price.
The SWC makes for the perfect MF backpacking and travel camera.
These days, I'm lazy and find the 21mm on a M9 crops square to the same view as the SWC and in doing so provides the perspective shift so often desired.
However I do often dream of returning to the darkroom and printing perfect frames from the SWC complete with double V rebate
jwicaksana
Jakarta, Indonesia
Post some samples, Raid!
raid
Dad Photographer
I need to have my rolls developed. Then I will post images.
jwicaksana
Jakarta, Indonesia
Gladly waiting 
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.