Hasselblad SWC Pics

I'd like to see some SWC shots too. I don't have one, yet, so I went looking in the Gallery:

Carlo Ch, Call me back

U21011I1222585289.SEQ.0.jpg



gcsk76, Empty

U4669I1239631333.SEQ.0.jpg



Carlo Ch, The path of purification

U21011I1222585287.SEQ.0.jpg



Lovely work, people! Let's see some more please.
 
Not my best, but as no one else is posting, one taken late this afternoon - with my SWC/M.
1/30s f/4.5 handheld with Tri-x standing in Rodinal for 1 hour ! ISO 1600+ ?
I am amazed at how little grain there is and that the highlights held up, but would have liked more sensitivity in the shadows.
Open-doors day in Edinburgh - so selected buildings normally closed to the public were open. Taken in the dimly lit Royal College of Physicians Edinburgh

RoyalSocPhyEdinburgh.jpg

Wish I had a 21mm Summilux.
 
comanche grasslands

comanche grasslands

comanche grasslands...
 

Attachments

  • comanche grasslands.jpg
    comanche grasslands.jpg
    59.3 KB · Views: 0
Well they moved my Thread To "evil SLRs,"! :bang:
Maybe It's a reflex camera :D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I also think that some swc owners hate scanners like me too;)

I wonder which forum is most appropriate? Perhaps "Point'n'Shoot"?

You will have to learn to love your scanner - digital is the modern thing you know. :) If you wet print you can always scan the prints.
 
I wonder which forum is most appropriate? Perhaps "Point'n'Shoot"?

You will have to learn to love your scanner - digital is the modern thing you know. :) If you wet print you can always scan the prints.

I think so. And from my experience the Epson V700 is very good and easy to use.
 
FrozenInTime...which Tri X is that you used..the 400 i assume, not the 320? or is that the old tri x

It's the current Tri-x 400 labeled 400TX on the box and negs.

Debusti Paolo said:
I also think that some swc owners hate scanners like me too

I've never had much success with flatbed scanners - focus, flatness and banding issues,
So for web use I now 'scan' B&W negs by taking a picture of the neg on a lightbox with a cheap DSLR (Olympus E-420) and macro lens.
( Though I have yet to profile the camera well enough to get good color neg scans )
The print heads on my Epson 2200 blocked up ages ago so I don't have a digital printer - but I'm happy to darkroom print for best quality anyway.

ChrisN said:
I wonder which forum is most appropriate? Perhaps "Point'n'Shoot"?

There is a scale focus 35's forum : why not a scale focus MF forum
 
Wow, $1299 is an amazing deal.

I borrowed Monochrome's SWC and shot the following. Not a typical "portrait" camera, as it sure adds some interesting elements to the composition.

3269070299_1512e74b7d.jpg
 
It is a PITA, but can be useful if you insist on composing close up. You have to remove the VF, set the lens to B, use a release cable with a block, then focus, close the shutter, cock it, attach the magazine, remove the dark slide, shoot, insert the dark slide, etc, etc... it is more cumbersome than using a field camera, but at least SWC is much smaller...
 
I have an M4-P, my first Leica M body, that I'll be purchasing in a few weeks plus some CV lenses... when I add up total costs I could almost buy an SWC instead, of the dilemma! As much as I would love an M series camera, and SWC would be just as nice ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom