Hasselblad SWC with old 220 film

raid

Dad Photographer
Local time
9:26 AM
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Messages
36,567
I used expired 220 film on the SWC during a trip to Germany last summer.

link for Film 1: https://raid.smugmug.com/SWC-Germany-2-16-film-1/i-rnDCF6w

link for Film 2: https://raid.smugmug.com/SWC-Pensacola-2-17-Film-2/

link for Film 3: https://raid.smugmug.com/SWC-Germany-2017-Film-3/
For Film 1: The first film gave me 21 images, and some were underexposed while other showed a light leak, which I believe is not from the camera but from the old film.

I tried out different digital manipulations on the digital files from the film.
Next time, I may just use fresh 120 film. It would be different.


01-020bw-XL.jpg


01-011%20copy1-XL.jpg


01-013%20copy%20copy-XL.jpg


01-003bw-XL.jpg


01-020%20copy1-XL.jpg


01-019-XL.jpg


01-019bw-XL.jpg
 
Raid: In the one color shot of the cathedral, with the young ladies walking through, it may be the kind of light leak I have gotten when the film back needs servicing. There is a gear in the back that engages with the body for winding. When it gets out of sync, the force of winding tends to push the back away from the body, causing a leak. You might want to see if you are consistently getting a leak from the one back, in which case it needs servicing.

--Rob
 
Hi Rob,
I have 4 additional rolls of film just back, so I can inspect this leak issue. Thanks for the clarification. The leak was not seen in all images on the first roll. If the back is the problem, can it be serviced or should I just get another back? On the other hand, I will not get a 220 film back since there is no such film left to get!
 
Raid, When I had a back giving me this problem, I had it serviced by David Odess in Randolph, Maine. He's not the cheapest, but when I send him something, it's fixed once and fixed right.
 
Thank you for the tip. I will most likely next switch to the 120 back for fresh 120 film with the SWC. I was trying to use what I have left of frozen 220 film.
 
Raid: In the one color shot of the cathedral, with the young ladies walking through, it may be the kind of light leak I have gotten when the film back needs servicing. There is a gear in the back that engages with the body for winding. When it gets out of sync, the force of winding tends to push the back away from the body, causing a leak. You might want to see if you are consistently getting a leak from the one back, in which case it needs servicing.

--Rob
What a great tip Rob. Just enjoying Raids SWC pic's, and you come up with an answer that might face many Hassey users. Thanks. I see were our transporting gear is on the top right side for the film advance on the backs; and to have a light leak on the left side would have drove me nuts.
 
Right, the lens inverts the picture, so the left side of the picture is to the right side of the film back. So in the final picture, the leak would appear on the left.
 
Right, the lens inverts the picture, so the left side of the picture is to the right side of the film back. So in the final picture, the leak would appear on the left.
I agree. With the PME 51 that I use all the time instead of the WLF; it automatically corrects for this. "What you see by eye, is what you see in the viewfinder". I know Dave Lackey would find this of interest.
 
I agree. With the PME 51 that I use all the time instead of the WLF; it automatically corrects for this. "What you see by eye, is what you see in the viewfinder". I know Dave Lackey would find this of interest.

Yes, I find it very interesting.:)
I am also happy to hear why I need a new dark slide in case I bend the old one I have!

Thanks, guys!

Raid, hope the next roll of fresh film indicates no problems!
 
I agree. With the PME 51 that I use all the time instead of the WLF; it automatically corrects for this. "What you see by eye, is what you see in the viewfinder". I know Dave Lackey would find this of interest.

The SWC has no waist level finder. I look through an external viewfinder.
 
Yes, I find it very interesting.:)
I am also happy to hear why I need a new dark slide in case I bend the old one I have!

Thanks, guys!

Raid, hope the next roll of fresh film indicates no problems!

Thanks, Dave. I will find out today. A few years ago, I took several 220 rolls of film with the SWC, and some rolls had light leaks while other rolls were perfect.
 
220 film on an SWC, that would pretty much be my dream setup for shooting cityscapes.

I have a boat load of 220 film in the freezer (over 40 rolls, mostly Kodak Vericolor, also Fuji Astia and Konica Centuria) but unfortunately had to sell my Hasselblad kit last year to cover expenses from going out of business. The Horseman 842 is my only camera that can take it, with the 6x7 220 back. But, not nearly as wide as the SWC (62mm lens).
 
I like the fact that I can shoot 24 images without having to change film, but the 220 film is "very expired". I also have a 120 back and I will use 120 film next time.
 
You're not using 220 in a 120 back are you? You can't do that.

Your edge fogging is due to the film either not getting tight enough on the takeup spool or you're loading it in direct bright sunlight. usually this is due to slack in the leader when you load the back causing it to wind on lose.

The fog on the left side is due to a bad light trap where the slide goes in. They're easily replacible at home. You can get them off of eBay and it takes 5 minutes.

I've seen these problems many times.
 
Here is what I have used in the past, and it worked for me.
Easy to install; takes about 15 minutes
Small screwdriver required. Not difficult at all.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/HASSELBLAD-...545881?hash=item5696d23499:g:9OkAAOxy~g5RppHh

Try this per the ad instructions:

you can check your trap seal in 2 ways. Remove your dark slide and hold the magazine up to a very bright light. Looking at the dark slide area from the opposite side of magazine (from the crank side), check to see if there is light coming through anywhere the dark slide would come through. If so, you have a bad trap seal. You can carry this a little further, by inserting the corner of your dark slide into the magazine and twisting very slightly on the dark slide. Again, if you see any light coming through, you have a leak. The leak will normally start at the upper edge of the seal, so especially look at this section of the seal.
 
No, I used 220 film with a 220 back and I use 120 film with a 120 back. I hope that you are right about a potential bad light trap causing the light leak. This is easy to fix, as you have said. Thanks!
 
Here is what I have used in the past, and it worked for me.
East to install; takes about 15 minutes

http://www.ebay.com/itm/HASSELBLAD-...545881?hash=item5696d23499:g:9OkAAOxy~g5RppHh

Try this per the ad instructions:

you can check your trap seal in 2 ways. Remove your dark slide and hold the magazine up to a very bright light. Looking at the dark slide area from the opposite side of magazine (from the crank side), check to see if there is light coming through anywhere the dark slide would come through. If so, you have a bad trap seal. You can carry this a little further, by inserting the corner of your dark slide into the magazine and twisting very slightly on the dark slide. Again, if you see any light coming through, you have a leak. The leak will normally start at the upper edge of the seal, so especially look at this section of the seal.

I will also consider this. Thank you.
 
Back
Top Bottom