Huss
Veteran
Minolta CLE
...While they may have some of their own issues, you don't have to worry about foam deteriorating or not having meter batteries.
Leica isn't necessarily a "rabbit hole" nor is inherently expensive. I shot Canon Serenars on my M2 and M4-2 for nearly twenty years. Most of my lenses now are modern Voigtlander and '70s Leitz Canada lenses.
... I say 'almost' because the Russian gear is a crap shoot. It's not pricey but can be a time sink. I don't have excess time so I stay clear of that stuff.
Try them all!
Hi,
I agree with this but bitter experience (several models) tells me that Leica issues are expensive; for the cost of a usual repair etc (involving a complete strip down)
If you want the RF experience buy a FED or Zorki 1 and, if necessary, send it to Oleg for some of his magic. Total cost will be very little; the first film in it cost more than my FED 2 and Industar-61LD and that was before processing etc.
I can't tell the difference in handling between my Leica Model II and the FED/Zorki 1; their prints come out a little better but that's due to the lens coating and the RF being more contrasty due to the tinting on the USSR models.
Regards, David
David, I've had a number of Zorki 4k and Fed 5c bodies over the years and there's a WORLD of difference in use between them and ANY M body. While it's true that the do contain a rangefinder mechanism, any coincidence between them and an M body (or even a Bessa R body) is solely coincidental (no pun intended.)
I have a 1983 model M4-P that I bought for essentially nothing. (It came with a power winder, Summicron, and MR-4 meter that I sold pieced off, subsequently paying for the entire kit.) I recently took it in to my local repairman thinking it might be time for an overhaul (the "L" seal is still intact) and even though there's a little dust in the viewfinder, the shutterspeeds are spot-on. It needs nothing, 33 years hence.
A complete overhaul for an M body can run to $400 if it needs parts, but there are a LOT of them out there that, like mine, don't need anything and if exercised regularly likely won't.
So, yes, sometimes its a crap shoot in buying used, but if you buy a quality camera used to begin with, it has the potential of lasting you a lifetime if you choose to keep it and use it that long.
Ko.Fe. and Tim,
Nikon F series, hmmm? Interesting. I was looking at the OM series 1 and 2, but passed because of finding so many that had ruined prisms due to melting foam. SRT just didn't grab me. Same with Canon SLRs.
I'm going to read up more on the Nikons. Any suggestions for lenses? I have a lot of fixed glass already in the P line (35,50,85) and the 42mm of the Olympus. Would you suggest a short to medium zoom and a medium to long zoom to start with, or should I stick with fixed? I like fast, sharp glass so usually that means fixed, but maybe I should get some zoom lenses for something different.