Erik van Straten
Veteran
A $5 Chinese tilted and vented 43mm hood will work just fine.
Yes, but they are too wide (and therefore too big) because of the vents.
Erik.
A $5 Chinese tilted and vented 43mm hood will work just fine.
This looks like a copy of the well know Waltz shade. It's nice, but still interferes in the viewfinder and its diameter is larger than the diameter of the lens barrel.
My ideal is the shade for the Elmar-M 50mm f/2.8, just a ring in the filter mount with the same diameter as the lens. The advantage is that it does not show up in the viewfinder and is small enough to carry around on the camera all day without causing any discomfort or irritation and accepting the same lens cap as the lens.
Erik.
Forget the hood, and go hood-less?!
I'm not a fan of hoods unless the lens really needs one.
Yes, but they are too wide (and therefore too big) because of the vents.
I am also looking for a hood for my Nikkor 5cm 1.4 so it seems the Heliopan would be the right one for me, I will be using it on my M2 with the amedeo adapter. Thanks for this thread Megido! And thanks for the tips guys!
Giulio
Then you need a Noctilux 50mm f/1.2, the only 50mm lens that needs no hood. Read this:
![]()
Result : tons of photos spoiled by one of my fingers being in the frame. Since I got that hood, it doesn't happen any longer.
For the Summilux 35mm steel rim this is not a good solution because Heliopan does not offer this shade with a 41mm thread.
Sounds like they can make it upon customer's request and send it to their retailer. Just ask them
これはドイツ語?オランダ語?
まぁ、どちらにしても読みたくても読めないな〜。
そもそも、どのノクティルックスにも興味がないしね。
Well, my bike-repairman helped me: