How do I shoot like this 1950 photo?

[Pico]

Judging by the focusing technique, either the photographer was very good with follow-focus, or more likely he preset focus and waited for the bicyclist to move into the zone. This later technique was very common then. 35mm was not a popular professional format at that time. I suspect the photographer used a medium format press camera because the economy wasn't so robust in France at the time to justify large format, and enlarging wasn't commonplace for news work. So, good old slow film with little anti-halation backing (lowers contrast in the otherwise higher contrast film), a bluish filter will get you closer. (I am reluctant to suggest getting a pre-WWII lens because so many of them are damaged now.)

Above all, have fun with experimenting.

 

[excellent]

Leitz Summar!!!

 

[charjohncarter]

Every once in a while I take a 50s image (by accident). It is usually with a 6x6 TLR and usually with TriX, I have done them with Tmax400. I also find that if I use just a little flash they look a little more 50ish. This is TriX with flash and HC-110h (what the developer has to do with it I don't know, I suspect nothing); modern subject but 50s look:

And one I took in the early 1962, TriX with flash indoors (AG-1 bulb) and I don't remember the developer, but probably D-76 (and again I don't think that had anything to do with it), Leica IIIf.

 

[Leigh Youdale]

In the 1950's a 50ASA (ISO) film was considered medium to fast and 80-100 ASA was just about top of the tree. Films of 25 - 32 ASA were more common.
So there's a starting point. Use slow film.
Secondly, emulsions were different then, so I'd be looking at Efke 25 or 50 if it's available - or Fomapan (although I have issues with their quality control).
Thirdly, lens coatings were uncommon. Find an uncoated lens.
Fourth, to throw foreground and background out of focus you need a longer than standard lens (which in those days was 50mm for 35mm film cameras) - maybe 90mm or even 135mm on 35mm film or equivalents for MF.