telenous
Well-known
After lurking for quite some time in the darkroom forum, I took the decision to wet my ankles with some of the chemistry. I read very carefully about the various stages and chemicals, the importance of timing and about how easy the whole thing really is. So, last week I ordered everything and a couple of days ago everything was with me.
I am now in the very pleasant position to announce that I have my first two rolls developed and scanned 🙂
Not everything was a bed of roses of course, not for me anyway. I will not tire you with the details of what went wrong in my first attempt - suffice it to say that the meatball pasta I was preparing, at the same time as I was developing my first roll, was delicious, all the while the hair blower is not necessarily the best way to dry the reel for the Paterson tank (it may melt the delicate plastic) and I can confirm that the wetting agent cannot be used to develop film. At all. 🙄 :bang: 😱 😱
The second attempt went better (see photos at the end of this post). Of course that was expected because it couldn't go worse. And so, a roll of Ilford Delta 100 I developed in DDX came out mostly right. Photo 1 is from it. In Photo 2 you can see where things went wrong - there's a dark patch in the middle. I suspect I left it a little longer in the developer? There was no meatball pasta this time roung but perhaps I got my times wrong. Anyway most of the frames came out as expected.
By the third roll, I was feeling a little bit like a veteran. Photos 3-6 (posted next) are from a Neopan 400 developed again in DDX. The entire roll looks fine to me (but please excuse any dust or scratches - the photos are fresh from the scanner and they are not PSed).
The Darkroom forum has a wealth of information and I am really, really grateful to all those RFFers who frequent it for their spot on advice in various threads. Although I never asked a question directly I always knew where to turn for help.
Many thanks!
I am now in the very pleasant position to announce that I have my first two rolls developed and scanned 🙂
Not everything was a bed of roses of course, not for me anyway. I will not tire you with the details of what went wrong in my first attempt - suffice it to say that the meatball pasta I was preparing, at the same time as I was developing my first roll, was delicious, all the while the hair blower is not necessarily the best way to dry the reel for the Paterson tank (it may melt the delicate plastic) and I can confirm that the wetting agent cannot be used to develop film. At all. 🙄 :bang: 😱 😱
The second attempt went better (see photos at the end of this post). Of course that was expected because it couldn't go worse. And so, a roll of Ilford Delta 100 I developed in DDX came out mostly right. Photo 1 is from it. In Photo 2 you can see where things went wrong - there's a dark patch in the middle. I suspect I left it a little longer in the developer? There was no meatball pasta this time roung but perhaps I got my times wrong. Anyway most of the frames came out as expected.
By the third roll, I was feeling a little bit like a veteran. Photos 3-6 (posted next) are from a Neopan 400 developed again in DDX. The entire roll looks fine to me (but please excuse any dust or scratches - the photos are fresh from the scanner and they are not PSed).
The Darkroom forum has a wealth of information and I am really, really grateful to all those RFFers who frequent it for their spot on advice in various threads. Although I never asked a question directly I always knew where to turn for help.
Many thanks!