Rob-F
Likes Leicas
Although I love the XPAN, one thing I don't like is that the standard 45mm lens does not cover quite enough image height. Height is an important aspect of composition that helps create the illusion of depth by including enough foreground. So my first design change would be to make the standard lens about 40mm, or even a little wider. As a matter of fact, the 38mm Biogon of the SWC will cover the 24 x 65mm format with room to spare. And the viewfinder would be resized to match the 38 to 40mm frame.
Next, one of the things I really like to do with the XPAN is mount the transparencies in a 24 x 54mm slide mount, to project in my Hasselblad projector. But that leaves 11mm of film width that I have to crop away--a bit of a shame. So here's what I would do about that. I would do away with the 24 x 36mm setting on the XPAN, and substitute a 24 x 54mm option in addition to the 24 x 65mm one. There would be a finder frame for each aspect ratio.
As it happens, I now shoot my slides for projection in the 500C/M with 40mm Distagon, or the SWC with 38mm Biogon.
How would you change the XPAN?
Next, one of the things I really like to do with the XPAN is mount the transparencies in a 24 x 54mm slide mount, to project in my Hasselblad projector. But that leaves 11mm of film width that I have to crop away--a bit of a shame. So here's what I would do about that. I would do away with the 24 x 36mm setting on the XPAN, and substitute a 24 x 54mm option in addition to the 24 x 65mm one. There would be a finder frame for each aspect ratio.
As it happens, I now shoot my slides for projection in the 500C/M with 40mm Distagon, or the SWC with 38mm Biogon.
How would you change the XPAN?