haagen_dazs
Well-known
how is the metering on the xpan 1 with the 45mm lens?
i have read that the xpan seems to underexpose by 1 stop on negatives and 1/2 stop for positives
is this true?
any recommendations for usage?
the compensation dial can only do +- 1/2stops
many thanks all!
i have read that the xpan seems to underexpose by 1 stop on negatives and 1/2 stop for positives
is this true?
any recommendations for usage?
the compensation dial can only do +- 1/2stops
many thanks all!
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Well I can't give direct experience with the XPAN1, but my XPAN2 gives excellent metering & exposures in A mode, but only on shutter speeds over 1/2 second. Meter can't be trusted below that as all is well underexposed.
nksyoon
Well-known
I also found my Xpan 1 unreliable for longer exposures.
quantum-x
Established
XPan2 isn't to be relied on for long exposures, as the 2eme poster pointed out - assuming the 1 is the same.
I normally carry an SLR / light meter with me to get an approx, and then either bracket or shoot over
I normally carry an SLR / light meter with me to get an approx, and then either bracket or shoot over
BlackCloud
Member
For shooting under normal conditions, I've found the meter to be right on.
However, I find that it underexposes both @ night, and @ elevation. Get above 5,000' and everything starts going dark......:bang:
However, I find that it underexposes both @ night, and @ elevation. Get above 5,000' and everything starts going dark......:bang:
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
I have experienced underexposure with my XPAN 1. Most shots are correctly exposed, but every so often, they are underexposed for no apparent reason. I do not use long exposure times, as I shoot at handholdable speeds, 1/30 and shorter. I haven't kept records to be able to know when I shot on aperture prioity, and when on manual. But when shooting on manual, I do go by the built-in meter, adjusting to get the center dot to light while pointing at a medium reflectance area. OTOH I have never gotten an overexposure with this camera. Could it be that the camera is a little biased toward underexposure; and we should set the film speed one step lower than the box speed? I wonder.
Share: