Huss
Veteran
This is a popular internet myth (check the tables): (1) different types of camera and lenses are treated differently. (2) different countries (for example Germany vs. UK vs. Japan vs. Korea and/or Canada) are treated differently, and (3) there is a threshold ($2k?) that the M10 certainly exceeds. I have paid customs on a lens coming from the UK, for instance.
A more detailed version of the above document is here:
https://www.usitc.gov/publications/docs/tata/hts/bychapter/1400htsa.pdf
(the acronyms in the tables are important)
Roland.
I didn't pay any customs on a limited edition Rolleiflex from a Leica shop in Holland, that was a lot more than $2000. And I didn't pay any customs on a Zeiss lens from Leicashop Austria which was a lot more than $2000.
They just shipped it to me, I didn't do anything to avoid paying customs.
dutycalculator.com
Huss
Veteran
dutycalculator.com
According to that site, to California from Leicashop Austria:
"Camera is duty free."
kxl
Social Documentary
A more detailed version of the above document is here:
https://www.usitc.gov/publications/docs/tata/hts/bychapter/1400htsa.pdf
(the acronyms in the tables are important)
Roland.
You are referencing an outdated document (from 2014). The most current document (eff. 1/1/2017) can be found here:
https://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/index.htm
See Chapter 85, specifically 8525.80.40.
ChrisLivsey
Veteran
I would, pedantically, take issue, with tongue in cheek, to the thread title, in my mind this strategy does not make the M10 cheap, less expensive certainly, but cheap?
Share: