davidnewtonguitars
Family Snaps
I always love the "what happened to my roll?" threads.
These from one roll, from a bulk roll of HP5, in ID-11. A few good exposures, many with striations, this is the worst. They aren't scratches, the emulsion isn't scratched. Even the clear leader has striations, the end doesn't. There are random "blobs" on the film also.
These from one roll, from a bulk roll of HP5, in ID-11. A few good exposures, many with striations, this is the worst. They aren't scratches, the emulsion isn't scratched. Even the clear leader has striations, the end doesn't. There are random "blobs" on the film also.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
Did you tried to wipe it off by fingers?
farlymac
PF McFarland
I recently had that same issue on some Tri-X. It's a shutter issue, namely all cracked and leaking light as it travels across the film.
Here is the thread about it. https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=170030
PF
Here is the thread about it. https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=170030
PF
davidnewtonguitars
Family Snaps
I use Kodak photo-flo and 2 well wetted and squeezed out sponges to wipe the film before hanging to dry. I've done this since I have developed film with no effects.
I think this is a "bad spot" on the emulsion, as I can not detect any actual scratches on the film. If it were a bad curtain, I think it would be on every frame, and worse on a well lit scene, and it is the opposite, worse on a poorly lit interior.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
Is it only at one frame? Exactly within one frame? If so, then PF might be right.
randy stewart
Established
film/image damage
film/image damage
There are no physical scratches, and the odd marks running along the length of the film, but only periodically, with other images good, negates the film being scratched in the bulk loader or the camera. It probably does not relate to problems in the developing chemistry itself. We do not know what kind of processing tank was used.
My ideas in no order suggesting relative probability:
1. An intermittent light leak during the bulk film loading process, light filtering through the light trap. Some loaders do not have a positive lock on the door covering the cartridge.
2. If developed with a rotary processor, like a Jobo unit, some mechanical failure of the processor & drum causing inadequate delivery of fresh developer to film.
3. Manufacturing flaw in the bulk film roll.
It's a real puzzle.
film/image damage
There are no physical scratches, and the odd marks running along the length of the film, but only periodically, with other images good, negates the film being scratched in the bulk loader or the camera. It probably does not relate to problems in the developing chemistry itself. We do not know what kind of processing tank was used.
My ideas in no order suggesting relative probability:
1. An intermittent light leak during the bulk film loading process, light filtering through the light trap. Some loaders do not have a positive lock on the door covering the cartridge.
2. If developed with a rotary processor, like a Jobo unit, some mechanical failure of the processor & drum causing inadequate delivery of fresh developer to film.
3. Manufacturing flaw in the bulk film roll.
It's a real puzzle.
farlymac
PF McFarland
Italics mine: PF
I thought so too along those lines, as I got some frames at the first part of the roll that seemed to be okay. It got worse as the roll went on, which might suggest the curtain was getting worse with use.
On my camera, I inspected the curtains, and it appears one of them has been recently replaced with the other one being all cracked up. I've been told the striation will appear mostly when using the faster shutter speeds, so maybe you were changing shutter speed, instead of aperture like I do. The same issue happened with some BW400CN I next ran in the camera (and used a different lab for the developing), only it was worse which kind of backs up my theory of the curtains getting worse with use.
It also had a front side light leak which meant whomever changed the one curtain didn't do a very good job of it.
PF
davidnewtonguitars
Family Snaps
My camera, an M2 with perfect looking shutters, which were replaced around 2000 by Leica in London, if I can believe the former owner.
I don't use a bulk loader, I load cassettes in a dark bag. I load Nikkor reels in a dark bag also. The striations are about half of the roll starting at one end, and fading out somewhere in the middle. That is the 2 images I show in the OP the worst frame and the best frame. See the lines in the worst frame go from frame to frame even through the dark area between frames. Would not that rule out curtains as a fault?
We will see on the next roll which is just about depleted, 5222. I will also use a different developer. If it shows up on that one, it may well be shutters, or mechanical.
I'm betting it is the film emulsion, or some handling defect that I inflicted on that roll.
I don't use a bulk loader, I load cassettes in a dark bag. I load Nikkor reels in a dark bag also. The striations are about half of the roll starting at one end, and fading out somewhere in the middle. That is the 2 images I show in the OP the worst frame and the best frame. See the lines in the worst frame go from frame to frame even through the dark area between frames. Would not that rule out curtains as a fault?
We will see on the next roll which is just about depleted, 5222. I will also use a different developer. If it shows up on that one, it may well be shutters, or mechanical.
I'm betting it is the film emulsion, or some handling defect that I inflicted on that roll.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
Do you realize it could be 20 years old lie?
farlymac
PF McFarland
If the shutter curtains are leaking light, then it's not just the action of the curtains moving across the film, but also the film moving past the curtains when being advanced that causes the striation. So if the deterioration is bad enough, you're likely getting the leak while rewinding the film too, adding to the streaking, and thus the in-between frame exposure. And nearly twenty years on shutter curtains of a camera that may not have been stored under the best environmental controls could easily have worn them out, depending on the quality of material used. I've read that a Leica overhaul is only good for about ten years, no matter who does it.
PF
PF
Daryl J.
Well-known
I had very similar happen with a roll of HP5 in 120.
FYI
We never came up with a solution really.
FYI
We never came up with a solution really.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Have you contacted Ilford? They have been very helpful in the past tracking down odd stuff like that.
Carlos Cruz
Established
add keykode - numbers found on the box or along perforation. If it shows up on in unexposed areas it's probably faulty batch of negative.
Malcolm M
Well-known
You didn't load the film back to front, or anything silly like that? The Canon logo on the strap is reversed.
davidnewtonguitars
Family Snaps
I scanned 2 strips of negative upside down. The good exposures were on 1 of those, so I dismissed that could cause the problem.
Here are 2 more frames, the garden doesn't have striations, exposure good, but a blob on the left upper corner, the other is an exposure with the lens cap left on, yes I still do that from time to time.
Here are 2 more frames, the garden doesn't have striations, exposure good, but a blob on the left upper corner, the other is an exposure with the lens cap left on, yes I still do that from time to time.
Malcolm M
Well-known
Curiouser and curiouser. You seem to have 3 completely separate faults going on simultaneously. The lines on the original photo are dead straight, consistent with the film being pulled over a rough surface. Those in the (intentional test) photo above have some vertical displacement. The Scream masks I can't begin to explain.
retinax
Well-known
This film is clearly cursed or haunted. I'm sure Steve Huff can help.
davidnewtonguitars
Family Snaps
So just reporting back on the next roll thru this M2, this time 5222 in HC110, the roll is normal, good on all frames.
I'm pretty convinced it is a film emulsion issue, defective in this spot of the 100' roll. I might contact Ilford if the next roll I spool off has some of the same results.
I'm pretty convinced it is a film emulsion issue, defective in this spot of the 100' roll. I might contact Ilford if the next roll I spool off has some of the same results.
farlymac
PF McFarland
Could be the canister you used for the first load is defective.
PF
PF