HU for the very very rich

"Ein Stuck" in German means something like "one piece" (but not "one-piece", I think). Maybe it's unique, a one-off pair with a special inscription?
 
If that's what they really go for, then that would have been a hell of an investment. I seem to remember them selling for around 30% more than regular M's a few years ago.

Come to think of it, I think I know somebody with an Einstueck. Now let's see if I can get them to trade it for my Canonet.
 
From photo.net:
The M6 Platin was platinum-plated and specially engraved vs this Hermes thing which is a stock chrome MP with $20 (being charitably liberal)worth of leather stuck on it. The HCB M6 was auctioned for charity. Other commemoratives--including the M6J which *did* cost Leica quite a bit to make--were a fraction of the cost of the Hermes. And they all commemorated something or other even if it was a relatively unimportant event. The two exceptions were the Ein Stueck and the Jaguar, both of which were obnoxious instant collectibles. I agree about the grey hammertone LHSA. It's a beautiful execution but I don't understand why it should be $1500 more than a stock MP when the LHSA black-paint was only $500 more than a stock M6TTL.
You can read the whole thread here: http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006Evh

Another summary:
...996 of "Ein Stück"...
From here: http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=006KYc

It seems to be a collectible for the sake of being collectible. Buy it, quick, before I do. 😀
 
jaapv said:
Is is waayy over the top. One-off dedicated M sets like the one for Mr. Havel etc. are being auctioned for about 100.000,-- $. That means that a Ein-Stuck would go for say 20.000

Exactly my feelings, Jaap. I mean, there are almost ten times as many of these as RPS sets which the same dealer is selling for £3500.

Collectors, who can odds 'em, eh?

Mark
 
If it were 24K gold (and Leica has made 24K gold gear), then maybe, if it were signed by Liv Tyler, blessed by the Dalai Lama (...), and used by Che Guevara. Maybe then, and only then, it would reach (perhaps) a rarity status that would warrant that kind of money.
 
Considering that this Leica was issued in the 90s (I remember having read so somewhere, maybe in Cameraquest), I now wonder about the price the Millenium M7 will reach in some 5 years.

Heck, let the rich collectors support Leica! 🙂
 
Has anybody considered that the price is incorrect? £101, 532 seems a little too precise (I might have been interested if it was £101, 531). Looks like a glitch in the Ffordes database. My guess as to the correct price would be something around the £2.5k mark.
 
To make a long story short, it's probably for one of these types who will put it in a glass case, never contaminate it with a roll of film, and just sit and admire it.

At one point there was a story that the above-mentioned Gandy had an M4 that had belonged to Garry Winogrand. It was WELL used, and he was asking somethng like $100,000 for it. So maybe it's also who it belonged to.
 
Gabrielma mentions blessing and signing it. I've heard that one of the best ways to make a Leica worthless is to have your name engraved on it. That is, unless you're the Dalai Lama!!
 
Another comment: Gandy mentions, among many others, the Anton Bruckner commemorative edition. Suffice it to say that Bruckner is a somewhat problematic composer to consider. For reasons known only to God, some of his symphonies, particularly the earlier ones, exist in several versions, and recordings can depend on which version the conductor chose.

There is nothing unusual about composers revising their works after trying them out. But the final version by the conposer is normally accepted as the 'standard' version. In Bruckner's case, not only did he himself make revisions, but later "editors" seem to have gotten into the act. So it can be a toss-up.
 
Back
Top Bottom