HU: New Canon Lenses at KEH

[wlewisiii]

Just looking tonight, not that I can afford anything :bang: :bang: :bang: , and saw that they have:

28/3.5 bgn $189
35/2.8 bgn $165 (!)
35/2.8 bgn with finder, lens caps & case $205 (!!!)
50/1.2 bgn $299 (not great, not bad)
50/1.8 bgn old style chrome $144 or with filter ring dent $119
135/3.5 bgn $89 (!!!)
135/4 bgn - big, chrome & heavy but --- $37 (!!!!) If you want an occasional use long lens that's a really good deal.

These all seem to me to be quite good prices on some very nice lenses.

Couple of really good sounding bodies right now as well.

William

 

[SolaresLarrave]

These are the things I prefer to know as little as possible about...

But thanks anyway! You're a kind soul... 🙂

 

[rbiemer]

William,
Thanks for the heads up! dunno if I really trust their photos, though:
(LINK)KONI OMEGA RAPID.😀
Rob
EDIT: folks, the page I thought I was linking to is a page that KEH has for a Koni Rapid Omega camera. Except the stock photo is for a Kiev 60. Small amusment for me.
Sorry.

 

[wlewisiii]

Oh, they use stock photos. But I've found thier descriptions to be accurate and, since their grades are on appearance not functionality, a screaming deal can often be had from them if you aren't fussy about how something looks 😀

William

 

[rbiemer]

I have been happy with them in the past, and I do trust their grading and descriptions just not that particular picture. 😀
Rob

 

[Stephanie Brim]

$399 isn't bad for the 100/2. Always wondered how that lens is wide open.

 

[wlewisiii]

I have been happy with them in the past, and I do trust their grading and descriptions just not that particular picture. 😀
Rob

Snort! Your link didn't work so I just thought it was thier usual stock photo issue. Then you're follow up made me follow the link tree down into the site... That's too funny for words. Have you emailed them about it yet?

William

 

[rbiemer]

William,
no, I haven't emailed them. But I previewed the link and it worked fine for me. The first time. I just clicked it again and it linked to the last page I was looking at? I can link to the photo itself but that's not as funny. I do figure it is a simple mis-post on their part.
Rob