back alley
IMAGES
Who is dissing it Joe? I had one for awhile. Nice camera, but wished it was more then 6 megapixels.
no one...i have been thinking about this for awhile...that so many folks want a drf but buy 4/3...
Who is dissing it Joe? I had one for awhile. Nice camera, but wished it was more then 6 megapixels.
why folks with m mount lenses that want to shoot digital refuse to try the rd1!?
so, why is the rd1 dismissed?
The Epl1 is not a rangefinder
The Nex7 is not a rangefinder
The Nikon D4 is not a rangefinder
They are not worth comparing to the R-D1 - if cameras were only about the image produced everyone would have picked a single standard design by now. The handling and viewfinder quality is a huge factor.
You may be able to use Leica M or screw mount lenses on other digital cameras but they do not offer optical viewfinders. There are many situations where an optical viewfinder is the best tool for the job, like in a dimly lit room.
I'd have gotten one a long time ago, except that I'm a wide-angle guy. The widest frameline in the R-D1 finder is for a 28mm, which only gives a 42mm equivalent view. On top of that, I'm told I wouldn't be able to see the 28mm framelines with my eyeglasses. My options would be to use my 24mm with my 35mm finder in the hot shoe, or else my 21mm and "shoot loose" with the 35mm finder. In the end I chose an M8.2. With my 28mm lens, I get about a 37mm equivalent, and I can use the built-in finder. That's what I use most. Then if I want to use the 21mm, a 28mm auxiliary finder frames rather accurately.
Isn't dismissed, mate.
There are two or three reasons to replace the R-D1 with a
newer/other cam- to produce big prints, photograph macro
stuff or using a flash system.
To shoot a hundred pictures a minute it might give better
machines too.
For all other opportunities the Epson is as good as any other
cam in the world. It's just a matter of taste I think.
Everyone complains they want a TRUE RF (actual rf coupling mechanism) that takes Leica M mount (native)... How many cameras can you name that do that? If you need the R-D1 to make money, then there too many cameras to name that do this...in fact you probably should stick with a modern DSLR or shell out for the m9
But for everyone who wants to have fun with this hobby, use their favorite glass on a true RF body, then the whole complaining about the price is irrelevant. If the price ever hits the $500-600 range, im going to seriously buy another body at least. But i suspect when it hits that price it is when they are beginning to fail and epson is no longer servicing...or the market finally responded to demand and NEW Rf's are out there. But until then... the price holds because the alternatives are far and few between. The x100, the nex etc.. are all nice cameras but i just dont enjoy using them as much. if you do then great, but the r-d1 is so fun i carry it 24/7. And iso 1600 compared to the m8 was superior, a huge factor for me cause i shoot at night often due to work and such. (yes iso 1600 isnt amazing, but with my fast lenses it does the trick A LOT of the times).
I dont print like chris (and if i do i generally dont go very big nor am i selling). But how many people on here complaining about lack of dRF's that take M-mount are printing like chris or really need more than 6 for their web images?
fortunately, i don't really understand the whole digital thing all that well...i just look at the images.
unfortunately there dont seem to be any fast 25mm lenses, affordable or otherwise. A 25 1.7 would be very nice to have.... or better still a 23.3333 1.4.