I finally started shooting in DNG. WOW!

raid

Dad Photographer
Local time
1:38 PM
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Messages
36,569
Last evening I shot my first DNG images with the aim to get better looking images back, and it worked for me. I am amazed at the quality of the DNG files.

A good friend (let's call him nairb) suggested to me yesterday to start shooting in DNG, and he showed me some photos taken as DNG. I was sold on the spot.

Today, I got Adobe CS2 as a start, and I am handling DNG files this way.
I am sold on using my M8 and M9 from now on only in DNG setting.
 
you'll have a lot more flexibility in processing your files now, Raid. The advantage of DNG is to allow you to re-interpret your images in post without losing information. If you're using LR the processing engine is more powerful than CS2 and you will get better results in post.

Have fun!
 
It really is an eye opener when you for the first time see your images as DNG files. The details are awesome. I see my children in some images as if they were in front of me. Many people have told me before to shoot in DNG, and now I am convinced that this is the way to go for me.
 
Vic: How can I post a DNG file here? sumgmug does not accept it either. I would not know how to post such a file.
 
This is one of the images that I saved in CS2 from DNG to jpg for posting here. I took it just before sunset yesterday.

med_U3565I1373849301.SEQ.2.jpg
 
you'll have a lot more flexibility in processing your files now, Raid. The advantage of DNG is to allow you to re-interpret your images in post without losing information. If you're using LR the processing engine is more powerful than CS2 and you will get better results in post.

Have fun!

I will next get the latest LR, Lynn.
One step at a time ....
 
The DNG is a raw file. When you shoot in JPG, the camera interprets it for you.
When you shoot in DNG, you have to interpret it yourself with Photoshop + CameraRaw or Lightroom. Once interpreted, you need to save a TIFF version of it (lossless format) AND in JPG so you can post it online. I suggest also to keep the raw file. That's where Lightroom comes handy.
Shooting in raw will simply give you more data to work with in post.

EDIT

.PSD (photoshop format) is also a lossless format, but TIFF is a universal format, more suited for archiving.
 
Thank you for the tip, Sylvester. So the TIFF version keeps the adjustments while the DNG file keeps the raw information saved.
 
Thanks. As for the "blue" in the image, this is what it looked like. It is not a color shift.
 
So is shooting in RAW the same as shooting in DNG? I've got a GX1 which I can shoot in RAW. How is DNG different?
 
So is shooting in RAW the same as shooting in DNG? I've got a GX1 which I can shoot in RAW. How is DNG different?

DNG is only a open format for RAW data. Canon uses CR2, Nikon NEF, Fujifilm uses RAF, etc. Leica uses the DNG format.

When shooting in RAW, your GX1 will produce a file. That file is the RAW data that needs to be interpreted. Import in into Lightroom or Photoshop/CameraRaw and you will be able to interpret the file.

Adjust exposure, contrast, black point, white point, highlights, shadows, white balance. Then in Photoshop and/or Lightroom do your dodging and burning, add local contrast, sharpen your image properly, etc etc.

When importing into Lightroom, the program will ask you if you want to convert your RAW from the GX1 into DNG. I'd suggest to convert it, because the DNG is an open format, so you'll always be able to open it with a program, even if Adobe dies. But then, archiving is a whole other debate.
 
Thank you for the tip, Sylvester. So the TIFF version keeps the adjustments while the DNG file keeps the raw information saved.

The TIFF will keep the best quality with your adjustments. With proper settings (default ones normally) you will even be able to change those adjustments later in Photoshop.
The DNG should be kept just like a negative. Imagine the TIFF is a print that you'd use as an orignal for publishing a book or in a magasine. The JPG is the publication.
 
Back
Top Bottom