I might be compelled to bring legal action against RFf

[J J Kapsberger]

Clearly there's no help for you Socke. Are you coming aboard?

 

[Bingley]

A negligence claim against RFF? Hmmmm. There are some defenses you might want to consider before proceeding: contributory negligence, comparative fault... etc.

I was thinking that a claim of intentional infliction of economic distress might be more fitting... but not sure that's a cause of action recognized in the State of Internet.

 

[back alley]

I am a victim of RFf!


welcome brother...!

 

[Marc-A.]

I studied 2 years of law and I learned this : send me your ZM Biogon as my fees, and I'll be removing a "weight" from you, you will feel much better by having just one lens

I studied 2 years of psychoanalysis, and surprisingly I learnt the same

AT THE VERY LEAST there should be some kind of warning label/statement on the home page!

That's an idea! Maybe something like: Smoking RFF kills

Your only problem will be - no money left for the lawyer...

That's the twist!

 

[mfunnell]

My SLRs want to sue for "Alienation of Affection".

...Mike

 

[gb hill]

I studied 2 years of psychoanalysis, and surprisingly I learnt the same




That's an idea! Maybe something like: Smoking RFF kills


That's the twist!

ReFFer MADNESS

 

[rpsawin]

JJ, until you have a Jupiter 12 in LTM and Contax/Kiev mont as well as a Zeiss Contax Biogon 35 in Contax G mount and plan on buying a Planar 35 in M mount plus a Zeiss Ikon to mount it on, you're not in danger!

GAS? Just walk by!

You see the guy with the breifcase walking by with a spring in his step? He's on the way to the bank with your money.....

Bob

 

[tedwhite]

Hey, Socke, your GAS photo is sooo apropos. And it's a fine photo, also. One question: If your photo is in Madrid, why is the inscription below "GAS" in English?

Or is English in Europe more pervasive than I thought? Merely curious.

Ted

 

[thomasw_]

i love the zm 35 as my main lens these days. all of my zm lenses are great performers: 25,35,50/2.