Ilford FP4+ in Rodinal 1+50

Kenj8246

Well-known
Local time
11:18 PM
Joined
Apr 23, 2011
Messages
806
Location
College Station TX
While these shots are not as nice as the ones in Chris' thread, I am happy with the way they turned out. I'm starting to like FP4+ for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is the way it dries nice and flat. 🙂 Compared to, say, Neopan 400. Still love Neopan, though.

Captive Sumatran tigers at the Waco Zoo, shot at 100, developed for 12:00 @ 68C. My agitation is a little different: 30 sec initial and then 5 sec every 2 minutes.


Captive Sumatran tigers, Waco Zoo by kenj8246, on Flickr


Captive Sumatran tigers, Waco Zoo by kenj8246, on Flickr


Captive Sumatran tigers, Waco Zoo by kenj8246, on Flickr


Captive Sumatran tigers, Waco Zoo by kenj8246, on Flickr

Kenny
 
quimby-1.jpg


Here's one of mine. I haven't developed FP4 in Rodinal in a few years. I like PMK better, but Pyro developers are a pain to work with, so for most people I recommend Rodinal 1+50 for FP4.
 
I don't shoot much FP4, here is a shot or two from a few years ago.

Nikkormat, 50mm ƒ2, FP4 in Rodinal.

62527739.jpg


And from a Mamiya 645 1000S, Rodinal 1:25

94113785.jpg
 
I use the FP4+, I really like it with rodinal. 🙂

Some examples:

Landscapes [rated at ISO64]:
hendaia_kaneta_01_sqb_ps80m.jpg


hendaia_badia_02_sqb_ps80mm.jpg


hendaia_kaneta_07_sqb_ps80m.jpg


All Bronica SQ-B + PS80mm​

Portraits [rates at ISO125]:

Ga%C3%ABl_Itsasontzian_01_PS.jpg


8603530830_113b09c6bf_o.jpg

All with Bronica SQ-B and PS65mm.
 
Oh yeah, FP4+ and Rodinal 1+50 is truly great. For a number of different reasons I now tend to use 400 speed film all year long, but I do have some pictures that mean a lot to me taken with the above combination and really like the look.

Greetings, Ljós
 
Back
Top Bottom