Film explorer
Member
Hi,
I recently exposed some Ilford HP5 (35mm) at EI: 200, as well as 400. I wanted to use HC-110 Dilution H.
I was wondering if anyone else had done this before? Do you have a time you can recommend to me (I realise that I still will have to test). How about agitation scheme?
How do you think this combination performs? Compared to TRI-X?
Thankyou in advance^^ if anyone has some information on this.
I recently exposed some Ilford HP5 (35mm) at EI: 200, as well as 400. I wanted to use HC-110 Dilution H.
I was wondering if anyone else had done this before? Do you have a time you can recommend to me (I realise that I still will have to test). How about agitation scheme?
How do you think this combination performs? Compared to TRI-X?
Thankyou in advance^^ if anyone has some information on this.
znapper
Well-known
Google gave me these
http://photo.net/black-and-white-photo-film-processing-forum/00Hn16
http://photo.net/black-and-white-photo-film-processing-forum/00TYef
http://photo.net/black-and-white-photo-film-processing-forum/008LWo
and
http://www.largeformatphotography.i...ing-HP5-from-Rodinal-to-HC-110-what-to-expect
http://photo.net/black-and-white-photo-film-processing-forum/00Hn16
http://photo.net/black-and-white-photo-film-processing-forum/00TYef
http://photo.net/black-and-white-photo-film-processing-forum/008LWo
and
http://www.largeformatphotography.i...ing-HP5-from-Rodinal-to-HC-110-what-to-expect
Bob Michaels
nobody special
Film explorer: process it just like you have been doing Tri-X. I find no discernible difference between the two. Whatever difference there is between the two films is less than the difference between one frame and another. I have many prints made with HP5, Neopan 400 and Tri-X. I cannot see any difference.
I shot Neopan 400 for about 8 years but with about 5 bricks of HP5 mixed in the middle when Neopan was unavailable. Then I switched to Tri-X about 2 years ago because of price. My transitions from one film to another included shooting several rolls of each and developing in the same tank to search for differences. I cannot find any differences of note.
I shot Neopan 400 for about 8 years but with about 5 bricks of HP5 mixed in the middle when Neopan was unavailable. Then I switched to Tri-X about 2 years ago because of price. My transitions from one film to another included shooting several rolls of each and developing in the same tank to search for differences. I cannot find any differences of note.
Film explorer
Member
Thanks znapper and Bob!
I actually tried to check the massive development chart website, but couldn't find results for H dilution at 400.
Thanks for those links, excellent reading!. Also Bob I will try your suggestion and soup as I do TRI-X. I have heard that HP5 is a robust film for handling, which is good for a beginner like me^!^
I actually tried to check the massive development chart website, but couldn't find results for H dilution at 400.
Thanks for those links, excellent reading!. Also Bob I will try your suggestion and soup as I do TRI-X. I have heard that HP5 is a robust film for handling, which is good for a beginner like me^!^
Bob Michaels
nobody special
........................ I actually tried to check the massive development chart website, but couldn't find results for H dilution at 400. ...................
Traditional thinking is that the Dil H time is double the Dil B time. My experience supports that. After once trying alternatives, I am back to 10 minutes using Dil H with Tri-X, HP5 and Neopan 400.
Film explorer
Member
Does any members have examples of this classic combination already uploaded to flickr or to their gallery here??
paulfish4570
Veteran
some of my most recent photos shot with hp5 and developed in hc-110 dilution H are in my RFF gallery.
Bob Michaels
nobody special
Does any members have examples of this classic combination already uploaded to flickr or to their gallery here??
I do not do the flickr or RFF gallery thing but any b&w photo that is not a square on my personal website was developed in HC110 Dil H. That is the only developer I have used in the last 10 years. Now all photos were shot with either Tri-X, Neopan 400 or HP5 but I don't bother tracking which since it makes no difference.
Film explorer
Member
Paul and Bob, thanks - I just woke up down under with the thread about Kodak's demise and nearly spilt my coffee on my pants! It took some sustained reading until page 3 to see that everything was okay.
I am now going straight to those photos you both suggested. Have a nice day!
I am now going straight to those photos you both suggested. Have a nice day!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.