rolfe
Well-known
Apologies if this has been mentioned earlier...
When I wet print HP5+ and Tri-X I can't tell the difference between them.
When I scan, HP5+ has much more grain than the Tri-X.
This has been true with any number of scanners -- Noritsu, Imacon, drum scanner...
Why? I have no idea, but HP5+ is clearly not optimized for scanning.
It is an otherwise excellent film, and these comments are about 35mm scans. At MF and larger, I don't think grain is an issue.
Rolfe
When I wet print HP5+ and Tri-X I can't tell the difference between them.
When I scan, HP5+ has much more grain than the Tri-X.
This has been true with any number of scanners -- Noritsu, Imacon, drum scanner...
Why? I have no idea, but HP5+ is clearly not optimized for scanning.
It is an otherwise excellent film, and these comments are about 35mm scans. At MF and larger, I don't think grain is an issue.
Rolfe