MNS
Established
While looking through my late fathers photographic odds and ends I found a Industar 26M 52mm f/2.8 lens.

Using a LTM adapter on my M-P 240 I tested it and was surprised at some of the results.
Knowing this lens like many Soviet lenses flare in bright conditions, so I fitted a Soviet plastic lens hood. These shots of the shed were taken with sun behind me, so you would think with a hood this wouldn't happen. Stopped down this issue gets worse, I've never seen anything like it before!



Images above f/2.8 - f/11 - f/22 ...Into the direction of the sun, I would expect flare, not from behind.

Indoors or away from sunlight this lens is perfectly OK to use. Lens elements look OK for a Russian lens and it's age.

In all the years I've used cameras, including ones from the former Soviet Union, I don't think I have ever seen anything quite like it. My Jupiter 8 or Jupiter 3+ 50mm lenses have never flared like this before.
I can't work this out, is this a digital thing or flaw in the glass?

Using a LTM adapter on my M-P 240 I tested it and was surprised at some of the results.
Knowing this lens like many Soviet lenses flare in bright conditions, so I fitted a Soviet plastic lens hood. These shots of the shed were taken with sun behind me, so you would think with a hood this wouldn't happen. Stopped down this issue gets worse, I've never seen anything like it before!



Images above f/2.8 - f/11 - f/22 ...Into the direction of the sun, I would expect flare, not from behind.


Indoors or away from sunlight this lens is perfectly OK to use. Lens elements look OK for a Russian lens and it's age.

In all the years I've used cameras, including ones from the former Soviet Union, I don't think I have ever seen anything quite like it. My Jupiter 8 or Jupiter 3+ 50mm lenses have never flared like this before.
I can't work this out, is this a digital thing or flaw in the glass?