Interesting photography in Slate magazine

[Roger Hicks]

Not sure that I like it, but I'm not sure I dislike it either. It's worth looking at.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/behold/2...phy_one_image_at_a_time.html?wpisrc=obnetwork

Cheers,

R.

 

[lynnb]

thanks Roger, definitely worth a look - he reminds me a bit of Hockney

 

[robert blu]

Interesting...
robert

 

[Gareth Rees]

Not sure about it either.
Very interesting

 

[sreed2006]

He's a real cut-up, isn't he?

 

[rbiemer]

I like the work as an object--or sculpture, maybe?--, not too sure where it fits into "photography" .

Thanks for the link, Roger!
Rob

 

[randolph45]

Pointlillism?
Would Seurat be intrigued or rolling over in his grave?

We could call it pinillism

 

[Mackinaw]

I give the guy an "A" for imagination, that's for sure.

Jim B.

 

[d.keljikian]

Graphic, but for photography/sculpture working with the third dimension, I love this work.

http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/...ut-from-layers-of-wire-mesh-by-seung-mo-park/

I saw the actual pieces at a gallery during "Open Studio" weekend this summer in Bushwick (Brooklyn, NYC). The computer screen cannot begin to describe this work adequately.

Doug

 

[Roger Hicks]

So far, it seems that everyone's reaction is the same as mine:

Um.... that's really interesting... Um...

As Lynn says, much like some of Hockney's work.

Cheers,

R.

 

[gdmcclintock]

It's too "overdetermined" for my taste; then again, I've never been attracted to "conceptual" photography.

 

[paulfish4570]

thank you, roger, for the link.
i think his work definitely is art. but as photography?
interesting. hmmmmmm ...

 

[Pablito]

their photo blog is a good resource. Was not aware of it before, thanks.