back alley said:
would we think it was so 'foolish' to care this much if the scratch was on our new car?
if it were my new zi i would be most unhappy to have a mark on it. of course i know it would still work and mount my zm lenses but i would have a moment of disappointment.
Actually, I'm not sure how to make a car analogy with this one. I'm of the mind that a scratch or dent in a car, it's not worth replacing the door the offending mark is on, or wherever. I guess the closest I could come woul d be someone getting a scratch on the trunk of their car and having the trunk replaced with a trunk with a spoiler on the back?
Actually, a closer one may be a BMW with factory rims. You drove up a curb and messed up the tires, and dented the rims. You get them replaced with new tires and shiny new *INSERT BRAND NAME* rims. I guess that would be the closest. Yeah, so if you went to the car enthusiast forum and asked if the *bling bling* rims will fit on *Brand X* tires, you'd probably get a lot more help.
Then again, not many in the car enthusiast forums would be caught dead with a scratch on their car. They'd get it retouched or repainted instantly.
That may be the issue right there. Are we a car enthusiast forum that cares a lot about cosmetics? We blab on about "user" cameras and oggle people with nice brassing on their cameras, and yet we're worried about a litte scratch? We're a bit schizophrenic as a community, which basically means one thing. We're diverse and come with many opinions.
This means we'll not agree on some things. *shrug*
SDK said:
But it is the most expensive piece of non-darkroom equipment I own, and I had it made to look how I wanted it. You can call that foolish, but why should I care about your opinion?
I actually didn't see him calling it foolish. You're right though. You don't have to care about his opinion, or anyone elses who doesn't agree with you. I'm not sure if you understand this but I'll try to explain. Please don't assume that I'm insulting you because I'm not.
Humans have a tendency to assume that other humans with more expensive toys or more material goods like to "flaunt" them. IE. show them off for good reactions. There is an assumption made, based on the language you used to describe your camera; That you were asking for help but at the same time, stating that you can afford such an expensive item and afford to replace entirely a part on it no matter the cost.
Also, you state that you like the markings on the bottom plate of the MP 'better' than the standard ones on the M7. You like the markings better. Actually, you still haven't stated if there were any mechanical problems with the M7 due to the dent.
Do you see why another human being may be thinking that you're simply showing off AS WELL as asking for help? I put AS WELL in capitals to make sure that no one missed it. Like I said, I'm trying to explain to you why I or others may see your original post in not such a good light.
Anyways, arguing on the internet is a pointless endeavour since both sides don't have to care about each others opinions.
If I've managed to insult you with the above, then you lack reading comprehension. This last line, however, is meant to be insulting to those who can't read.