Andy Kibber
Well-known
No better time to do it than while she's dealing with other fixes.
I agree.
I had the VF in my .85 M6TTL upgraded. There was significant improvement but it wasn't perfect. I believe the .85 finders flare more than the lower magnification ones.
Let us know if you notice a difference when you get the camera back.
maddoc
... likes film again.
Also, the frame marks for the M3, M2, M4 and M4-2 are more accurate than those of the M4-P, M6 and later M cameras except for the current MP.
Small correction: The frame-line masks including the M4-P with brass top-plate are more accurate (of the old M2/M4/M5 style) while all following models including the M7 and MP (but NOT the MP classic) have the less accurate frame-lines (smaller and corrected for 3m distance)
Roninman
Established
I was having film advance issues on my .72 Wetzlar M6 and sent the camera to Youxin. He replaced the film advance gear with a brass gear and while he was at it I asked him to do the finder upgrade. It's a big difference. The white out was infuriating to me and that is much improved. I think you should do it. Sherry does beautiful work and so does Youxin.
browncycle
Readyville, TN
To CLA or not to CLA?
To CLA or not to CLA?
I have had my M6 for over 10 years, bought it used from KEH, bargain condition and it has worked beautifully in many countries including my own. After reading so much about CLA I was wondering if I should send mine in and it might be even better. But I think the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" sentiment is the right one.
I have rarely noticed any flare and if it's too dark to focus it's usually too dark to photograph.
Ta!
To CLA or not to CLA?
I have had my M6 for over 10 years, bought it used from KEH, bargain condition and it has worked beautifully in many countries including my own. After reading so much about CLA I was wondering if I should send mine in and it might be even better. But I think the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" sentiment is the right one.
I have rarely noticed any flare and if it's too dark to focus it's usually too dark to photograph.
Ta!
skibeerr
Well-known
MCTuomey
Veteran
Translation required, I am a foreigner.
Wim
"char" = short form for characters
i think the poster means he added letters just to make the minimum posting requirement (10 digits/letters).
MCTuomey
Veteran
I have had my M6 for over 10 years, bought it used from KEH, bargain condition and it has worked beautifully in many countries including my own. After reading so much about CLA I was wondering if I should send mine in and it might be even better. But I think the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" sentiment is the right one.
I have rarely noticed any flare and if it's too dark to focus it's usually too dark to photograph.
Ta!
well, i wouldn't send it in under those conditions. some believe in preventive maintenance - having service done from time to time to avoid a more "catastrophic" failure. me, i think the concept applies to machinery like vehicles and home/industrial equipment, not cameras for which most have a spare.
Icarus
Member
The funny thing is I just took my M6 out to shoot the rest of the roll of film I had in the camera before boxing it up and sending it off to Sherry and now the film advance is working fine. The first couple of rolls worked fine then I had trouble with the last roll and now it seems to be working fine again. I guess I will see if it continues to have this issue before sending it in to Sherry. Unfortunately, now that I have made up my mind to do the viewfinder upgrade I really would like to have it done. Especially every time I encounter the flare/whiteout.
hexiplex
Well-known
Where is everyone shooting to get this viewfinder flare? I've shot with my M4-P everywhere and anywhere I've ever been, and I've never seen a hint of it. Maybe I just don't know what to look for.
Steve_F
Well-known
I had my M6 TTL upgraded last summer. It went to Leica UK for sticking framelines and I was quoted a small amount for upgrade parts as top would already be off. Huge difference. No White-out in certain conditions, better contrast.
I'd say it's worth it.
Steve.
I'd say it's worth it.
Steve.
Steve_F
Well-known
Translation required, I am a foreigner.
Wim
Everyone here is a foreigner
I only figured out the exact meaning of GAS two-months ago.
Steve.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Where is everyone shooting to get this viewfinder flare? I've shot with my M4-P everywhere and anywhere I've ever been, and I've never seen a hint of it. Maybe I just don't know what to look for.
It's not frequent but when it happens, it's infuriating, and you'll know about it. The rangefinder patch just goes white, with either no image or an image so faint and washed-out as to be useless. The worst I ever had was shooting some folk musicians on an outdoor stage at the Broadstairs Folk Festival at night: highly directional lighting. It was so bad I had to stop using the M4-P and use exclusively the M2 I was also carrying (I like to use 2 cameras, 2 lenses).
To the OP: yes, if it needs a repair, a reputable repairer will 'muck it out' while he/she is in there, and as others have said, that's the time for the finder upgrade. I'd certainly go for it. But a CLA if the camera is working -- no.
Cheers,
R.
sc_rufctr
Leica nuts
Just curious but has anybody done this on an M4-P?
I like mine but the viewfinder is not as good as my M3.
I like mine but the viewfinder is not as good as my M3.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.