David Hughes
David Hughes
People want to believe that what they have in their camera bag is the "best" as if there is some magic line of demarcation that separates those cameras capable of good photographs from those that are not. And "best" is often measured by how much something costs, coupled with historical significance, and unfortunately how cute it looks hanging from your shoulder, but anyone with an ounce of experience knows that good pictures depend on light, composition and creativity, and not gear. Any camera can take good pictures. Parenthetically, this is what drives me nuts about the digital crowd with their 'pixel peeping.'
Sorry for the rant ... I used to be part of that 'country club' crowd. Still use a Leicaflex SL though. Great camera.
"Best" for me has really evolved into which camera is easy to use, because that has somewhat of a correlation on the quality of my pictures. And in this regard, some of the FSU stuff (e.g., Fed 2) rates high.
Hi,
I couldn't agree more. And often for me "best" turns out to be a P&S. Mostly because I can get the thing in my pocket and get more than adequate results from it. There's a lot of them out there with decent lenses and just enough over-rides that are easy to use to give the dearest and best a run for their money.
Regards, David
PS And talking of best; I've been looking at prices and we are talking tens of thousands for a body and a few lenses in the "excellent" class...