Is this the future of digital RF ?

I think a few consumers will buy it, heck they buy anything. It is not the future and nothing will be unless it uses existing lenses.

An electronic viewfinder should be against the law.
 
Seems that Panasonic just reinvented the Canon PowerShot Pro1, an excellent camera made long ago (by digital history standards 😉) by Canon, and which didn't sell much in spite of all its interesting features (8MP, extremely well built, acceptable EVF, and L zoom actuated by hand).

About what the new Micro Four-Thirds system will become, well, no sé.

What I know for sure is that Nikon will never ever make any camera that mounts Leica M lenses, so don't expect a Nikon D-RF thing with a M mount. Some people see it differently but I think they're just believing in Santa there.
 
Recently at Silverbased:
Olympus showed their own prototype of a Micro Four-Thirds camera, made even more compact by omitting any eye-level viewfinder. This emphasis on small body styles has led some to hail Micro Four-Thirds as the arrival of the “digital rangefinder”—i.e. very compact cameras with interchangeable lenses.

Photo: 1854, the blog of the British Journal of Photography
Even the ribbed lens of the Olympus prototype seems reminiscent of certain 1970s compact RFs, like the much-loved Canonet QL17 GIII. (Note that the BJP article calls the prototype an “SLR,” which it is not: “R” stands for “reflex” viewing, precisely what Micro Four-Thirds models lack.)
But to me the most intriguing footnote to these announcements is buried in Panasonic’s future “Lens Roadmap.” In 2009, allegedly they will introduce a non-zoom, 20mm f/1.7 lens in Micro Four-Thirds mount. If we translate that to its equivalent on 135 film, this would be a fast 40mm lens—actually, just like 1972’s Canonet!—with a “wide normal” coverage that I would personally love. And because of the reduced flange-to-sensor distance, its optical design might even be a simpler, well-corrected symmetrical design.
So will compact, fast, well-corrected normal lenses come to digital, at long last? At a price we can afford? This remains to be seen, though I’m cautiously hopeful. But for the moment, virtually any random 35mm SLR from the past, equipped with its humblest possible lens option, offers something that remains a rarity in the world of digital.

 
The future of digi RFs will be along the lines of the Epson RD-1(s) and the M8, permitting the use of existing M-mount lenses. It's about supporting the glass in digi format, imho, more than anything else.
 
The Lumix G1 defines a new direction for future cameras:
  1. The viewfinder is a ~25mm cube, 100% coverage fly-by-wire electronic unit; mountable anywhere with depth-of-field preview and dioptric correction...all built-in.
  2. The "box" is 20mm deep with a non-proprietary interchangeable lens mount and 11-pin standardized electronic connection...auto focus is supportable, plus other ideas that may yet come. Slim enough to mount a preview/review LCD in the back and still slimmer than a Leica.
  3. The battery and electronics can be placed anywhere...and memory cards of any capacity is the same small size...
It is neither a reflex nor a rangefinder camera...just a camera. Configurable in any way.

So Panasonic made it look like a mini-DSLR (it is well known the hump is just styling); and Olympus so far made it look like a point-and-shoot...easy enough to mount a similar viewfinder up top and style it like a rangefinder without the pentaprism hump.

So if we think a rangefinder is better for street photography (pre-focused, pre metered point-and-shoot), or must have a Leica lens (so does the Lumix), or must be light and portable (the G1 and future Olympus are), or shaped like a simple box, or...the Micro four/third supports all that and more.

If the M8 has 10 M-pixel, the G1 has 12...a neat 4000 x 3000. In the digital world, lens focal length, chip format dimensions and a whole host of other parameters have no meaning, only field angle considerations remain. Pick the lens you want, from wide-angle's to telephoto's...even zoom's.

If the M-mount is classic, I will start calling the new trend M4/3...there was an M4-2 only not so long ago, no? 🙂
 
Back
Top Bottom