Is this Tri-X from Kodak just new packaging?

[yossi]

Or the good old emulsion that people love? Long shot I think.

 

[KoNickon]

I don't know, but I highly doubt they'd mess with Tri-X -- they'd have a riot on their hands. Are they using the old-ish (80s?) logo (red square in the upper part of the box) generally? I was never crazy about it myself.

 

[Mackinaw]

Tri-X and Ektar 100 are the latest Kodak films that are not being distributed by Kodak Alaris. Both of these films now come directly from Kodak.

Ektar and Tri-X Are Now Being Distributed Directly By Kodak

Added to the growing direct-from-Kodak lineup.

petapixel.com

Jim B.

 

[Disappointed_Horse]

Personally I think this new Eastman Kodak packaging looks much better than the old packaging Alaris had been using with “400TX” in big green characters set in that hideous font.

 

[Richard G]

Presumably unchanged. I saw Ektar 100 in 135 recently in Melbourne in a box with the Portra mauve blaze on it. Weird. Now this Kodak Ektar 100 PROFESSIONAL matching the new Tri-X. Marketing. I did not buy the mauve Ektar I have to say.

 

[Bingley]

My impression is that Eastman Kodak has retaken the marketing and sales of Kodak film, in addition to making it. So I think the new packaging marks this return by Eastman Kodak to handling most, if not all, of the aspects of producing and selling these iconic films.

 

[Zuiko-logist]

The packaging looks good. 80s style.

 

[Out to Lunch]

The new packaging of Kodak Gold

 

[raydm6]

I like it.

Rebranding articles:
➜ Eastman Kodak Rebrands More Photo Film as It Regains Distribution Control
➜ Is Kodak Finally Taking Back Its Film Business?
➜ https://www.dpreview.com/articles/9...les-of-consumer-film-after-more-than-a-decade

 

[kshapero]

My unscientific observation, is that the new Tri-X is the exact same as the old Tri-X.