Huss
Veteran
I don't like the results I'm getting developing it myself. So I'm hoping one of you lot has a good suggestion...
It's 2020, where do I send my Fuji Instax for developing?
- Thread starter Huss
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 18
- Views 896
Hogarth Ferguson
Well-known
Thank you for asking, I've been scouring the internet for an answer, too! Hopefully, someone comes along and helps us out.
madNbad
Well-known
Soon there will be a shop converting Instatax with Polaroid SX70 rollers. After the first run, customers will complain the images are uneven and have them updated with rollers from the SLR 680. The images will still not meet their needs, so back to the iPhone and Polaroid simulation.
KismetSky
Established
Post process in your phone prior to printing to an Instax Share printer 😛
pyeh
Member of good standing
Dwayne's does Instax I think.
TBH not even my Kodachrome went there back in the day. It went to Kodak Melbourne. From Singapore.
TBH not even my Kodachrome went there back in the day. It went to Kodak Melbourne. From Singapore.
lynnb
Veteran
Simple: Feed it back through the rollers for a second pass. The development paste will be squeezed back into the pod and then re-spread when it's ejected again. Squirt color dye through the slot for filter effects.
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
That’s funny. BTW, I am about to finish my coffee and walk outside. What lens should I take?
Huss
Veteran
Shouldn't that be what shoes should you take?
maigo
Well-known
Who is still watching this in 2020?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ricoh
Well-known
Either in your left or right hand, or down the front of your trousers. 😂
Pál_K
Cameras. I has it.
Maybe with Instax you can do what I do with Impossible film.
I use the Schrödinger's Cat method of development: the photo is exposed (and ejected), but not observed. Thus, the image is superposed in two states simultaneously: a good or bad image. As long as I continue to not observe it, I can believe the image is good. Only when the photo is observed will the wave function collapse to reveal a good or bad image.
I use the Schrödinger's Cat method of development: the photo is exposed (and ejected), but not observed. Thus, the image is superposed in two states simultaneously: a good or bad image. As long as I continue to not observe it, I can believe the image is good. Only when the photo is observed will the wave function collapse to reveal a good or bad image.
pyeh
Member of good standing
Huss, you can also send it to The Darkroom.
Huss
Veteran
pyeh
Member of good standing
In that case what about trying Monobath?
Huss
Veteran
By Jove I think you're on to something!
pyeh
Member of good standing
Or Negative Lab Pro.
dourbalistar
Buy more film
Maybe wait until you have a big batch. Then develop them in-stacks using bubble-bath.
Huss
Veteran
in-stacks? in-stacks?
IN-STACKS!!!!
should the kids be in the tub when I do this? or just the dog?
lynnb
Veteran
Depends on how much and what type of agitation. You could throw in a ball if you want more grain.
Similar threads
