It's official, it is goin to be a digital Pen

Sorry guys I know I post in here once every 2 seconds - I don't want to get annoying but this camera is really exciting to me

e-p1_back.jpg


Looking at that again I realized something - I bet the rear control "dial" is actually rocker switch - which would be why I can't make out a "dial" looking thing on the rear in the side-on pic, and would also explain that rectangle on the top right corner of the sketch.

If it's a well designed rocker switch and coincides with the ev compensation button well I'll be happy.
 
This leak is obviously working. :) But I'm betting there are some more details that we'll hear about in a few days that will make it even better.
 
well.... we don't know... It hasn't been released yet. Rumors put the price at $990us + kit lens (14-42mm or 17mm 2.8). I'll be lining up for one...
 
It looks - but for one nagging detail - like a killer camera.
That detail for me is the lack of any viewfinder per se. I really can't stand having to compose via an LCD on the back of a camera. I realize this is the way things are now with small cameras. But, for this luddite, it feels all wrong.
 
visiondr said:
It looks - but for one nagging detail - like a killer camera.
That detail for me is the lack of any viewfinder per se. I really can't stand having to compose via an LCD on the back of a camera. I realize this is the way things are now with small cameras. But, for this luddite, it feels all wrong.
Click to expand...

Ah.. maybe the hotshoe block pops up to reveal a EVF type built in finder ala the Canon Hansa :)
 
Pickett Wilson said:
it's kind of cute. But, without an optical finder, it's just another P&S. :(
Click to expand...

You're entitled to your opinion, as I am mine ... which is that that is pure balderdash. It isn't even officially ANNOUNCED yet, much less released.

Finders are pretty cheap, and given the size of this thing and the m4/3 mount, it can revolutionize digital photography for street/discreet. Others will be having fun. :D
 
fdigital said:
You guys have to realize that you're not going to get an optical viewfinder on that style of body. Firstly it has no mirror and thats why it's able to use a big sensor and tiny interchangeable lenses in the tiny body. A "see through" optical VF would be hard to make because of the interchangeable lens thing. You'd have to electronically design it to be able to automatically frame for zooms both wide and long and do it instantaneously, and the technology for that both isn't in existence and if it was would push the price of the camera up to leica levels.
In the original pen, it had an optical mirror, this digital pen doesn't because it can't to fit in the electronics. Note how the hot shoe was placed directly about the lens mount? That's so that aux finders will slot into there and be fairly accurate with framing.

You don't have to hold a PS camera at arms length, you can gold it by your hip or at half or quarter of an arms length if you want. Or even you can use an AUX finder and hold it up to your eye.
Click to expand...


Yup ... now I'm glad I haven't sold my Leica 35 and 21 finders. :D :D :D
 
rover said:
Nothing there to excite me. Just another tool to do the same thing. I don't need another camera system, and for that price it is way out of what I would be willing to pay for a P&S. Add the lack of a wide fast lens, I will be better served with an LX3 and maybe pick up a Pentax K7 as an upgrade from my K10d. I won't be buying anything before it is formally announced, but unless it is really tiny, it won't find it's way into my possession.
Click to expand...

OK, i have to admit, that is pretty cute. And I do want a small digi, P&S I think for myself. Not a system camera like I said.

So, I had a nice day today. I had my M2, 35mm lens. It was soo nice to shoot. I have not been meterless in a while. It makes photography so fun and simple. I didn't worry about exposure all the time, just saw the subject and shot. No AF algorithm screwing up, no lights and beeps distracting me, just the simple camera and lens.

But, this EP1 thingy, simple camera and one lens? That 17 isn't fast enough, or is it? That Olympus sensor has never impressed me (honestly, nothing Olympus ever has - I bet I would like the OM stuff though if I tried it), can it perform well, as good as a decent APsC sensor? Is it really small? I hope to see some specs soon, hopefully DPreview or Pop will have a hands on preview next Monday.

We shall see.

The price still sucks though.
 
Looks gorgeous indeed. If it does indeed have in-body stabilization, it could be a winner. I guess we will just have to wait and see.
 
Ralph -- I really need to get an OM in your hands. I think 2.8 is the new 1.8. ANY sensor is at least one stop faster than film, eh? A faster m4/3 lens would be too big on that body. Unless you get the M adapter and go 28 Ultron. :)
 
Pany is making a 20/1.7 that looks damn compact.

I had a 35 Skopar on the M2 today, and any compact other than the LX3 has a lens no fast than 2.8, so....... I hope it is a great lens, that will be cool.
 
Rover - to quickly answer your question re: 4/3rds - Yes, the 4/3rds sensor is on the same level as any modern APS-C sensor image quality wise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom