muser53
MUSER53
Excuse my French but (regardless of its innards) to my eyes this is one ugly POS.
Cute!
Maybe Jonny can design a matching shampoo bottle and back scrub brush 😀
You think it has Siri ?
Eh? No. Hell, I AM a journalist. So are a lot of my friends. Where's the denigrating? Where's the "personal resentment". All that we -- the old-fashioned journalists -- deplore is pretentiousness. Are you in favour of pretentiousness?
You don't need to be formally "qualified" to be a journalist. You just need to be good enough to sell your work. The very idea of "qualifications" for journalists is risible. Anyone with a reasonable standard of literacy and a love of words can do it, but some do it better than others. It's a bit like calling strip-tease a profession. Sure, you can be a professional strip-tease artiste, but that doesn't make strip-tease a profession.
One of the things you learn in journalism is to use words with some precision, which you are currently failing to do. You are imposing your own fantasies, sometimes couched in hopelessly vague terms -- "Smoke: nebulous blaming, shaming, etc to obscure or confuse. Fire: retribution for perceived "elite"" -- on what I've said. You're even stooping to personal insult: "obnoxius . . . pretentious . . . pitiful". Time, I think, for the ignore button.
Cheers,
R.
Are you familiar with the RSA? In full, the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, founded a bit over 250 years ago? Because if you aren't already a Fellow of the Society (F.R.S.A.), I'd be happy to nominate you.. . . i don't find ive all that impressive anymore
ios7, new mac pro are really not my cup of tea
Are you then prepared to accept its use as an empty label? Because if you are, it IS a hostage. At that point, it's not merely a meaningless distinction. It has ceased, by its very meaninglessness, even to be a distinction.. . . For me it is a simple term and for you it is a meaningless distinction because you don't like how it is used as an empty label by certain types, now the term is hostage to them?
I don't argue with the notion you can do just about anything with a complete absence of formality as long as it gets results. Hell, most of Orwell's stuff is crowded on my shelf, the very embodiment of the principle.
I'm sorry about the ad hominem, but you seem to have a... habit.
You're part of a profession. A rather old one. Many men and women, doing the exact same thing, have come and gone before you.
Are you familiar with the RSA? In full, the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, founded a bit over 250 years ago? Because if you aren't already a Fellow of the Society (F.R.S.A.), I'd be happy to nominate you.
Cheers,
R. (F.R.S.A.)
What? Flint-knapping?Seems to be a matter of semantics. You could apply the same logic to every activity since the proverbial oldest profession.
No, no, you misread my comment totally. Anyone with your awareness of design is EXACTLY what the RSA needs. That's why I'd be happy to nominate you.i love the design of apple until jobs's forever departure. i didn't know i am not supposed to comment on ive's design unless i am a member of RSA.
current apple designs are really not cup of my tea though.
i love the design of apple until jobs's forever departure. i didn't know i am not supposed to comment on ive's design unless i am a member of RSA.
current apple designs are really not cup of my tea though.
Beautifully phrased! Thank you!If a speaker of another branch of English, and a member of a "profession" that has it's fair share of this kind of discussion, can I suggest that Roger's trade versus profession discussion is a real, live issue but just not in the USA and related versions of English?
There are still members of the Medical fraternity in Australia and to a much greater degree in the UK who would be insulted to be described as professionals: they are tradesmen of the highest degree and proud of it. This is the reason for the British surgeons' habit of dropping "Dr" as a title and taking on "Mr" (or Ms?)- they have finally achieved a tradesman's qualification and can leave being a professional behind them.
Perhaps Roger would see it differently, but to a Surgeon of that tradition, "tradesmanlike" is high praise, while "professional" would be an insult. And as a manually skilled job, and with a Guild background in the Middle Ages, surgery IS a trade. As is image creation. Journalism's medieval background I think would be more murky, given literacy's association with the Church.
As a General Practitioner (a Family Medicine specialist, for those in USA/Canada), my branch of the Medical fraternity traces its origins to tradesmen too: to village surgeons and apothecaries. Physicians (Internal Medicine Specialists) on the other hand are professionals, having a history in university training and no practical experience whatsoever (historically).
Roger is not suggesting photography is UNprofessional, or that photography (or journalism) does not have specific skills and knowledge that raise it above some sort of robot-like activity. What he is saying (in British English) is that it has practical skills and a history of apprenticeship-based training. This makes it a trade.
And as I say, that can be higher praise than being a profession.
EDIT: I realised after writing this that I have lapsed into gender-specific words like "tradesman."
Cute!
Maybe Jonny can design a matching shampoo bottle and back scrub brush 😀
You think it has Siri ?